THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Table 1: Families and design features of the ward.
Families Privacy
Indicators/design features of the ward
Individual space and privacy 1-person bedrooms among the types of bedrooms (%)
Patients sharing bathrooms and toilets (%) Total private space per patient (m2
) ‡
View into bedrooms from the corridor (%) Door position monitoring, elopement warning (yes v. no)
Bedroom doors can be locked by patients (%) ‡
Number of patients on the ward ‡ Number of patients in the building (including other wards) ‡
Daylight, views and nature
Contact and accessibility of outdoor space Type of daylight access in corridors
Type of view in main corridor Type of view in living room ‡
Window size in bedrooms (daylight admission) ‡ Presence of outdoor space or garden (yes vs. no) ‡
Comfort and control
Personalisation opportunities and ability to control comfort levels Presence of air conditioning in bedrooms (yes vs. no)
Personal furniture (yes vs. no) ‡ Type of ventilation ‡
Patients can open the window (yes vs. no) ‡ Patients can control the temperature (yes vs. no) ‡
Facility level
Type and number of facilities for leisure or treatment Number of common spaces (kitchen, living room, smoking area, etc.)
Total common space per patient (m2 Safety )
Presence of room(s) for therapy and/or consultation (yes vs. no) Presence of a nursing station (yes vs no) ‡
Special safety measures on the ward Problems in corridors/easy 2-way walking (yes vs. no)
Supervision by camera/s (yes vs. no) Sight lines from the nursing station (yes vs. no)
Special type of window-glass (yes vs. no)
Violence proof walls (yes vs. no) Violence proof ceilings (yes vs. no) Violence proof doors and frames (yes vs. no) Violence proof locking devices (yes vs. no) Type of communication system patient-staff
Locking devices with delayed alarm and opening (yes vs. no) Presence of stripped bedrooms (yes vs. no) Door position monitoring, elopement warning (yes vs. no)
Overview living room (yes vs. no)
Locking devices in kitchen (yes vs. no) Type of security system for staff
Ward covers one floor/no stairs (yes vs. no) Patients have flexible access, within the ward and to outdoor space/
(electronic) pass/key (yes vs. no) Type and height of fences
Rooms for seclusion
Rooms or spaces for seclusion, including alternatives Number of seclusion rooms on the ward ‡
Number of seclusion rooms in the building ‡ Number of bedrooms that can be locked ‡ Presence of time-out, isolation, or otherwise designated areas that can be locked (yes vs. no) ‡
Presence of spatial alternatives for seclusion (yes vs. no) ‡ ‡ Components and single indicators (observed variables) that were included in the multilevel analysis. IFHE DIGEST 2013 51 – Facility level (α=0.59) ‡ – Level of supervision ward (α=0.65) ‡ Violence proof finishing (α=0.68) ‡
Presence of air conditioning on the ward (yes vs. no) Patients have access to internet in their bedroom (yes vs. no) Patients have television and radio in their bedroom (yes vs. no)
Comfort (α=0.76) ‡
View outside (α=0.70) ‡ –
Supervision bedroom (α=0.61) ‡ –
CATPCA-components (α) –
–
Special safety measures (α=0.71) ‡ –
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84