This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
SERVICE ROBOTS


institutions such as nursing homes, hospitals and mental healthcare organisations the focus for the service robot is on observation, alerting and performing logistical tasks such as the distribution of food and mail. The robot may be deployed for calamities, for example during the night, by doing initial checkups so that employees can better assess a situation. The upper limbs of the robot will mainly be used to move around the area to open doors and operate elevators.


Service robot market A mature market already exists for industrial robots, with Japan and Germany being the major players. However, worldwide, service robots are still in their infancy. In Japan the focus is heavily on robots which simulate human traits – so-called humanoids – which can act as a ´buddy´ for the elderly. In America and Germany the focus lies mainly on autonomous service robots. Currently, an American company called Willow Garage1


is


the only company that actually offers a service robot – the Personal Robot 2 (PR2) – which comes close to what we envision. However, this service robot is mainly intended as a research robot and, partly because of its selling price of €400,000, is not currently commercially viable and employable. We believe that, with our acquired


knowledge, our relatively low-cost design and our cooperation with the market, we are at least two years ahead of our potential competitors. Two years is approximately the duration of the TSR project. We expect that if Rose BV can continue at the TSR speed, we can extend, or at least maintain, this advantage. We expect to need three years to be able to develop Rose into a finished product. The ‘classic’ care providers are also a form


of competition for the service robot as instead of using service robots in care there are other alternatives such a permanent physical home care.


Robot costs The costs of the service robots are assumed as follows (using rather pessimistic assumptions):


• The sales price of the robot will be €65,000 in 2015 and €29,000 in 2021;


• The robot is depreciated over a period of five years; and


• The price of a service contract is 20% of the sales price per year.


This means that the annual rental charges for a robot will be €26,000 in 2015 and €11,600 in 2021 excluding financing charges. In addition we assume that, to be able to


offer a comparable level of service to the other alternatives, one operator is needed to control ten robots during the day and 20 during the night. Home care (including travel time) by an operator costs €40 per hour and permanent care costs are €30 per hour. When using a robot an additional two hours of home care per day is needed. If you have a permanent care provider at home, an additional one hour of home care is needed. Nursing home costs are €192 per person per day, corresponding to one care provider for approximately five clients. The costs per year for the three alternatives are shown in Table 1.


Conclusion The economical impact of service robots can be divided into three fields: • Opportunities for new companies.


‘It will take less than ten years for the service robot to be introduced into care.’


International Federation of Robots definition of service robots.


Service robots currently have no strict internationally accepted definition, which, among other things, delimits them from other types of equipment, in particular the manipulating industrial robot. IFR, however, has adopted a preliminary definition:


‘A service robot is a robot which operates semi- or fully autonomously to perform services useful to the well-being of humans and equipment, excluding manufacturing operations.’


With this definition, manipulating industrial robots could also be regarded as service robots, provided they are installed in non-manufacturing operations. Service robots may, or may not, be equipped with an arm structure as is the industrial robot. Often, but not always, the service robots are mobile. In some cases, service robots consist of a mobile platform on which one or several arms are attached and controlled in the same mode as the arms of the industrial robot.


Because of their multitude of forms and structures as well as application areas, service robots are not easy to define. Since 2007 a working group of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has been revising the ISO 8373 which relates to manipulating industrial robots. This revision will include an official definition of service robots.


• Expansion into alternative fields of application.


• Expansion to other countries.


New companies could be set up to build components for robots and for the assembly and maintenance of robots. Opportunities also arise for IT-companies to create software for new autonomous tasks and for training and consultancy. The social impact of service robots is also


interesting. It will lead to more hours and time for personal care. However, there may be groups who are initially not comfortable working with robots but these will, in the course, disappear. The new, digitally native, generation will probably have no problem with this development at all.


Reference 1 www.willowgarage.com


Table 1: Comparison – home care with robot, permanent care, and nursing home. Home care with robot (2015)


Robot Remote care provider Physical care Total IFHE DIGEST 2013 €26,000


12 x 365 x 40/10 = €17,500 12 x 365 x 40/20 = €8,750 2 x 365 x 40 = €29,200


€81,500


Home care with robot (2021) Permanent home care €11,600 €17,500 €8,750


€29,200 €67,100


24 x 365 x 30 = €262,800 1 x 365 x 40 = €14,600 €277,400


Nursing home





365 x 192 = €70,000 €70,000 41


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84