NEWS
Judge calls for Microsoft Xbox ban in US A judge at
the US-based International Trade
Commission (ITC) has called for some Microsoſt Xbox consoles to be banned from being imported to, or sold in, the US.
Judge David Shaw’s recommendation covers the 4GB and 250GB versions of the Xbox 360. He added that Microsoſt should post a bond equal to 7 percent of the declared value of unsold Xbox inventory already in the country.
Shaw’s recommendation follows his earlier ruling that Microsoſt infringed four patents owned by Motorola Mobility. In April 2012 he said the Xbox violated patents covering wireless communication, and transmission of video content between controller devices and game consoles.
At the time Shaw did not advocate a ban on
sales or imports but has since amended that recommendation, which the ITC released on May 22, 2012.
Te document shows that Microsoſt argued that an exclusion order against the Xbox did not serve the public interest because it would allow consumers to choose from only two video games consoles: the Sony PlayStation and Nintendo Wii.
Shaw rejected Microsoſt’s arguments as “not
persuasive”. He said there was a “strong public interest” in enforcing IP rights, and not enforcing those rights because of a potential economic impact should only occur “in exceptional circumstances”.
As we went to press the case was due to be heard by a six-member board at the ITC. Te board has until August 23, 2012, to decide on the case, which will be sent to the Obama administration if it is not overturned or sent back for further consideration. Te administration would then have 60 days to either sign off or reject the ruling.
Tis dispute is just one part of a complex patent war that the companies have been fighting for several years.
Earlier in May, a federal judge in Seattle blocked an attempt by a German judge to ban sales of some Microsoſt products in Germany. Te Mannheim Regional Court had ruled that Microsoſt violated patents owned by Motorola.
In a separate ITC ruling on May 18, 2012, Microsoſt secured a victory over Motorola. Te panel ruled that the mobile phone maker infringed one Microsoſt patent for soſtware that generated and scheduled meeting requests on mobile devices. Te ITC has recommended that Motorola devices using the infringing soſtware should be banned from being imported into the US.
8 World Intellectual Property Review July/August 2012
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84