NEWS
that copied the way that its soſtware, ‘Siri’, searches the Internet and mobile devices.
Koh banned sales of the Nexus before the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit overturned the injunction on July 1, 2012. Apple, which was forced to pay a $95 million bond, had until July 12 to respond.
Te companies are fighting a patent war spanning about 10 countries including Australia and Germany. Apple has suffered some setbacks recently—in June, a Dutch judge forced it to pay Samsung damages for infringing patents relating to connecting phones and tablets to the Internet. And in July, a judge at the UK’s High Court rejected Apple’s claims that the Galaxy Tab infringed the iPad. Pointing to differences in the design, Judge Colin Birss said Samsung’s products were “not as cool” as Apple’s.
One lawyer told WIPR that “the big question was at what point the parties sit down and come to a commercial resolution to close all of this litigation”.
EU unitary patent: what now for IP owners?
Following the long-awaited vote to split the Unified Patent Court (UPC) across three European cities, lawyers say there are still “fundamental flaws” with the unitary patent package.
Ending 40 years of debate over its location, the European Council voted on June 29, 2012 for Paris to host the court’s central division. London and Munich will oversee ‘thematic clusters’, which will specialise in chemistry and pharmaceuticals, and mechanical engineering, respectively.
But only three days later, the European parliament postponed its vote on the package aſter objecting to the deletion of Articles 6 to 8 in the draſt regulation. Te rapporteurs claimed that deleting the articles, which would allow judges to refer legal questions on patent infringement to the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), would “emasculate” the proposals.
A unitary patent is intended to make it easier and cheaper for IP owners to obtain protection across the EU. Under the new system, the UPC will resolve disputes across Europe. Te central division will hear cases on patents’ validity and non-infringement, while the clusters will oversee cases on infringement.
Te wrangling over the court’s location was seen as a major obstacle to forming the unitary patent system, in a process labelled a “dog’s dinner” by Simon Cohen, partner at law firm Taylor Wessing LLP in London.
But aſter clearing the hurdle of the court, the parliament refused to vote on the package, objecting to the deletion of Articles 6 to 8. Te articles have been a bone of contention between the parliament and Council, and practitioners are opposed to them
www.worldipreview.com
because the CJEU is not set up to deal with technical appeals from patent cases, Cohen said. “It has never dealt with substantive patent law and it has no specialist judges,” he said.
Keith Hodkinson, partner at law firm Marks & Clerk LLP in London, said the articles, if approved, would be a “fundamental flaw” of the system. But he said it is “not at all clear” that the Council can insist they be deleted, or that the EU Commission, the executive branch of the EU, will agree to their deletion.
According to Cohen the different approaches in the UK and Germany could be reconciled, but achieving this would not be easy. “A compromise could be to allow judges to adopt a discretionary approach, but it’s not easy to see a way through that,” he said.
Hodkinson said he would have preferred clarity on these “fundamental, practical issues” before the UK government had committed to the system. “So despite talk of final agreement, there are a number of pressing questions yet to be answered: this process could continue for some time,” he said.
Pointing towards the further wrangling between the parliament and Council, Cohen said it was “anyone’s guess” when the first patent will be enforced. While EU officials have earmarked 2014 as the starting date for granting patents, Cohen said this was “highly unlikely” owing to the many unresolved issues.
Chris Mercer, president of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys, added that he was unclear how different approaches to bifurcation—the splitting of infringement and invalidity issues into separate proceedings—would be resolved. Courts in the UK take a different approach from those in Germany, which hear cases on infringement and validity separately.
Partners at law firm McDermott, Will & Emery said this was still a “controversial” issue. “Bifurcation creates uncertainty, which some claim will encourage a wave of actions to be brought in Europe by non- practising entities. Certainly the complexities of the system will be a playground for strategists,” they said.
A spokesman for the Council said the parliament will have the final vote on the unitary patent package. Te Council and parliament must discuss and agree on the disputed text of the package before a vote can take place—expected to be later this summer. If politicians vote against the package they could vote on it a second time following further discussions, the spokesman said. A third rejection would require the EU Commission to propose something new.
Cohen added that London, where his law firm is based and which is set to play an important role under the UPC, will benefit from the changes afoot. “We hope that pharmaceutical companies will instruct London-based law firms to support them. London is well placed to deal with patent disputes— we have good lawyers, judges and a good system overall.”
World Intellectual Property Review July/August 2012 7
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84