JURISDICTION REPORT: JAPAN
A QUESTION OF TRUST: LICENSING TRADEMARKS
Ryo Maruyama Kyosei International Patent Office
It is a common practice for Japanese businesses to borrow and use internationally famous brands’ trademarks from the companies that own the trademarks, so as to boost their business activities in Japan. Our firm has oſten negotiated and administered such borrowing of famous trademarks on behalf of our Japanese clients. We believe that this trademark-borrowing trend will continue for some time, due to the Japanese people’s penchant for name brands and the trademark owners’ desire to earn royalty income for the use of their trademarks.
However, we are fully aware of the difference between the Japanese and some foreign countries’ concepts concerning the granting and registering of rights to use a trademark. Although in some other countries registration of a right of exclusive use or non-exclusive use of a trademark is not required for a licensee to secure such a right, or to make third parties aware of such a licensee’s right, the system in Japan is the opposite of that. In Japan, granting and registering a right of exclusive use or non- exclusive use of a trademark tends not to occur, because of the costs and time required for registering such a right.
For patents, since the Patent Law revision enacted on April 2, 2012, it has not been necessary to register a non-exclusive licence or a provisional non-exclusive licence to use a patent, because since then such licensing has been deemed to be an inherent right that is protected against third parties. However, the Trademark Law was not revised in the same way as the Patent Law, and therefore it is still necessary, as before, to register a non-exclusive trademark use right in order for a licensee to secure its rights against third parties. Accordingly, the costs and time required for such registration have not changed, and the owner of a trademark to be licensed must register a licensee’s right to exclusive use or non-exclusive use based on a licence contract.
In view of the difficulties associated with the licensing of a trademark in Japan, we wish to explain the IP trust system that was introduced when the IP Law was revised in 2004. As a result of that revision, if a licensor uses this trust system, there are virtually no costs, and almost no time is necessary to license a trademark. Te various rights that are licensed are administered by a trustee who is a property administration expert. Tis system is especially advantageous if a licensor must simultaneously administer the licensing of both a trademark and a copyright.
For example, in fictional character-based businesses in Japan, a trademark right concerning a character is obtained—in addition to developing businesses based on the copyright relating to the character—because of
62 World Intellectual Property Review July/August 2012
“THIS SYSTEM IS ESPECIALLY ADVANTAGEOUS IF A LICENSOR MUST SIMULTANEOUSLY ADMINISTER THE LICENSING OF BOTH A TRADEMARK AND A COPYRIGHT.”
the trustee of a licensed trademark right can perform all administration work for the right, such as the renewal of the trademark registration, the administration of the licensing contract, and so on.
Also, if the licensor expects to acquire many licensees (each of whom will be granted a right to non-exclusive use), the licensor will not be bothered by having to engage in activities relating to licensing if it uses a trustee, so that the licensor can direct its attention solely to its main business. We believe that the IP trust system can be effectively used by trademark owners.
Our firm also assists licensors in entering into trust agreements.
the greater enforcement power of a trademark right relative to a copyright, which need not be registered, and usually isn’t. In such a case,
Ryo Maruyama is a Japanese patent attorney and vice president of Kyosei International Patent Office. He can be contacted at:
info@kyosei.or.jp
www.worldipreview.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84