TEXT HERE NEWS
Apple and Samsung trade blows over patents
Apple and Samsung both scored victories in the space of a week in the complex patent war they are fighting across four continents.
On June 26, 2012, a judge in California issued a rare preliminary injunction against Samsung’s Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet in the US, saying it probably infringed a design patent covering Apple’s iPad.
In a separate case three days later, the same judge, Lucy Koh, granted an injunction against Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus for infringing a search patent owned by Apple. But an appeals court overturned that ban only two days later, allowing Samsung to continue selling the smartphone in the US.
A Samsung spokesman expressed the company’s disappointment with the first decision, saying Apple was claiming rights over a “generic design patent”. Apple was unavailable for comment when contacted by WIPR.
Apple’s claims that the Galaxy tablet infringes the iPad are part of a case filed in April 2011. A US jury is set to decide in a trial beginning on July 30, 2012 whether the tablet, among other Samsung products, infringes technical and design patents held by Apple.
In this dispute, Koh ruled in December 2011 that the devices were “virtually indistinguishable” and that the Galaxy probably infringed Apple’s IP. But she could not issue an injunction because the design patent may have been later invalidated if Samsung used prior art defences.
However at the US District Court for the Northern District of California on June 26, she sided with Apple following an appeal court’s ruling. Te iPad producer was ordered to pay a bond of $2.6 million. Samsung immediately lodged an appeal, which Koh later rejected.
Florian Mueller, a patent consultant based in
Germany, said it is difficult to win a preliminary injunction in the US. He said the harm to the alleged infringer “must be clear” while analysing the allegation must take place under “severe constraints” such as testimony and evidence becoming available late in the process.
He added that, in procedural terms, moving for a preliminary injunction is always “somewhat ambitious and aggressive”. “But given how slow patent
litigation in the United States is, it’s not
surprising that Apple looks for shortcuts to enforceable decisions,” he said.
Tree days later Koh presided over another case, which was filed by Apple in February 2012. Apple claimed Samsung’s Nexus smartphone used tools
6 World Intellectual Property Review July/August 2012
www.worldipreview.com
©
iStockphoto.com / doram
NEWS
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84