TRACK TECHNOLOGY
Adam Hewitt reports on plans to reintroduce passenger services on a branch line in Hampshire.
Marchwood station and its level crossing.
and transport leader, said: “There is no doubt that there is potential for the development of the rail network in South Hampshire and we have had some very constructive discussions with Network Rail and South West Trains on this matter.
“The outcome of the GRIP 2 study has enabled us to develop a business case for the develop- ment of the Waterside line but there is still a great deal of technical work to be done and de- tail to be worked through so we are still some years away from opening the line to passengers. Nonetheless what we have established so far is encouraging and I can see that a Waterside rail line could help enormously in reducing conges- tion on the A326. Tackling congestion to keep all areas of Hampshire moving is a key prior- ity for us, and we will continue to investigate any options which will improve travel and offer more choice for local residents and businesses. A rail line in this area would complement the existing public transport services available in the area and offer local residents greater choice and flexibility for travel.”
P
roposals to reintroduce passenger services on the branch line in Hampshire between Totton and Hythe have taken another step for- ward, with Hampshire County Council agree- ing to fund a GRIP 3 technical study.
The GRIP 2 study established a business case for re-establishing a passenger service on the line connecting Totton, Hounsdown, March- wood and Hythe – known as the Waterside area – whose passenger services were closed in 1966.
The line is currently only used for freight, but the alliance of local authorities wants an hourly shuttle between Hythe and Southampton Cen- tral, taking 23 minutes each way. Extending the service all the way to the terminus at Fawley, however, would extend the journey time too much to allow an hourly shuttle.
The London & South East RUS (route utilisa- tion study) by Network Rail last year examined the proposal for passenger services on the line, and concluded that although in timetabling terms it would be perfectly possible, the cost of re-opening the closed stations and making them DDA-compliant, alongside the need for South West Trains to procure additional rolling stock meant that idea “will have a low value for money business case”.
It added: “In addition, depending on the level 46 | rail technology magazine Feb/Mar 12
of investment in infrastructure on the branch to facilitate a new passenger service, there could be conflicts between a regular passenger service and freight growth if a large container port were to be developed at Dibden Bay.”
It therefore did not recommend the change, but Hampshire CC and the other authorities involved (a mix of district and parish councils and the national park authority for the New Forest) say the business case has now been es- tablished following the GRIP 2 study.
Cllr Mel Kendal, Hampshire’s environment
South West Trains’ stakeholder & accessibility manager, Phil Dominey, gave a cautious wel- come to the news, but made clear that the oper- ator has some concerns over the integration of this proposed service into the current network.
He told RTM: “South West Trains welcomes any scheme that encourages increased rail usage for passengers. We are keen to ensure any such proposal is fully integrated into the existing timetable and does not compromise train performance or the service we currently offer on the Southampton to Bournemouth line. To eliminate any potential impact on the existing services between Bournemouth and Southampton, South West Trains has re- mained in close contact with Hampshire Coun- ty Council over this proposal and regularly comments on the various stages of the study.
“South West Trains will continue to work close- ly with the council, consultants and Network Rail as this study is developed into a proposal.”
Above: The last train to call at Fawley station, in 1978. Fawley remains unserved under the new proposals as it is too far from Southampton Central to allow an hourly shuttle service.
The GRIP 3 study will begin in the spring, and its results will be analysed by Transport for South Hampshire before any decision to move onto GRIP 4 is considered.
TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
opinion@railtechnologymagazine.com
© sg1_trooper
© Clive Warneford
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92