This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FEATURE HEPATOLOGY


Show newS


The 4th Middle East Gasteroenterology conference is taking place during Arab Health from 23rd


-24th of January. To


register to attend on-site, visit the Delegate Registration Zone desks in the Al Wasl Foyer, situated between halls 4 and 5.


In vivo phosphorus-31 (31 P) MRS


provides metabolic information, which is useful when assessing fibrogenesis. The PME/PDE ratio has been used as an index of cell membrane turnover and has been shown to correlate with disease severity, assessed by histology in chronic hepatitis C. MRS provided a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 81% respectively for cirrhosis and showed statistically significant differences between mild hepatitis, moderate hepatitis and cirrhosis (see figure 3).


MRS IN HEPATIC STEATOSIS: In hepatic steatosis, proton (1


Water


 Figure 4: 1


H MRS. Proton (1H) MR Spectra (left to right) from (i) a patient with significant


hepatic steatosis, (ii) a patient with mild hepatic steatosis; (iii) a healthy volunteer. The intrahepaticellular (IHCL) lipid resonance is many times larger in (i) than (iii), with the hepatic water resonance scaled to the same height for comparative purposes. ppm = parts per million; IHCL CH2 = intrahepatocellular lipid. Reproduced from Thomas et al. 2005.


IHCL CH2


H) MRS


can provide information on the amount of liver fat. More recent studies have demonstrated to the potential to measure lipid composition non-invasively, which may change with disease state and with dietary intervention. Typical hepatic spectra contain water, fat and choline resonances, which can be quantified using external reference standards or expressed in terms of a percentage, Recent longitudinal work in patients with chronic hepatitis C has demonstrated a change in the ratio of PME/ PDE in response to antiviral treatment, separating virological responders from non- responders relative to the total MR signal (see figure 4). 1


H MRS is readily accessible to all centres that have a MR scanner 7.0 5.0 3.0 ppm


and most machines have the capability to perform such sequences as an addition to a standard MRI examination.


THE FUTURE OF BIOMARKERS OF CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE Inflammation, steatosis, fibrosis and fibrogenesis are complex multistep processes. It would be surprising if a single biomarker were able to describe liver disease completely. Accordingly, combinations of markers and modalities may describe disease more accurately


Table 1 Examples of serum markers for the assessment of fibrosis


Name


Indirect markers APRI


FibroTest


Direct markers ELF


FibroSpect Constituents AST, platelets


a2 macroglobulin, a2 and g globulin, total bilirubin, apolipoprotein A1


, gGT PIIINP, HA, TIMP-1, (age) HA, TIMP-1, a2 macroglobulin


90.5 41 99 92 77 73 74 76


Abbreviations: APRI, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index; gGT, g-glutamyl transferase; HA, hyaluronic acid; PIIINP, amino terminal of procollagenase III; TIMP-1, tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1; ELF, Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.


Accuracy (%) Se Sp PPV NPV


41 95 88 64 87 59 63 85


and reproducibly than one marker alone. Studies of marker combinations should be performed to establish optimal combinations, in terms of numbers of tests, accuracy of combinations and the provision of complementary information from the test components. Candidate markers differ widely in the equipment and expertise required, so cost-benefit analyses compared to routine liver biopsy are warranted. Serum panel markers and other imaging techniques including ultrasound and magnetic resonance modalities need to be investigated longitudinally in response to intervention in a number of disease states. As histological assessment of liver biopsy is itself a surrogate marker of liver disease, the challenge is to develop and validate protocols correlated to clinically meaningful outcome measures. Further research into non-invasive technologies for the assessment of chronic liver disease is required to optimise these techniques, to correlate with clinical outcomes and to incorporate them into validated management algorithms. ■


AH


 REFERENCES References available on request (magazine@informa.com)


Arab Health Show Issue 2012 61 1.0 -1.0


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196