Technology - Manufacturing
I
n the most complete, public discussion to date on the scope and character of the 450 mm wafer transition, representatives of SEMATECH, policy-makers from the European Commission, industry consortia, and technology suppliers met to discuss the implications of 450 mm transition at SEMICON Europa on October 13-14, in Dresden, Germany. Among the highlights of the 2-day session was the 450 transition price tag estimated by speakers at $25-$40 billion, much of it centered at the Global 450 Consortium (G450C), perhaps with little room for other industry consortia or non- G450C participants. According to Tom Jefferson, 450 program manager at SEMATECH, by mid-2013 to early 2014, a complete 450 mm production line will be established in New York containing 50 different tool types. The objective of the pilot line will be to develop data to support the purchase of production-line tools and it is unlikely that non-participants in G450C will be favorably considered for 450 production lines. According to many speakers, like the case with 200 mm tools during the 300 mm transition, when 450 mm reaches production, significant 300 mm development will cease.
What 450mm Means for Europe and 300mm
The 450mm Progress Review at SEMICON Europa was organized by Lothar Pfitzner, Fraunhofer IISB, and included sessions on R&D and Planning, Facilities, Silicon and Metrology, FEOL Equipment and Automation, and Technology and Device Issues. Georg Kelm, head of the European Commission’s Nanoelectronics sector, discussed the preliminary results of a draft study, due by year’s end, which seeks to clarify policy options and support considerations for the European semiconductor industry. Preliminary conclusions of the study claim that once 450mm enters full production, further 300mm node development will cease for tool suppliers due to limited resources and poor return on investment. Some equipment suppliers may choose to stay off 450mm and focus on specialty development on 300mm platforms, but the 8nm node is likely to be the 450mm equivalent of 65nm’s ‘300mm only’ moment. Furthermore, the “Post CMOS” era will likely be exclusively on 450mm wafers. Once 450mm is fully developed, spare capacity in 300mm will emerge, encouraging a
migration from 200 mm production, impacting the viability and competitiveness of both 200 mm and 300 mm fabs in Europe and the world. In 15-20 years, even low volume, mature technologies in MEMS, power and analog could migrate to 450 mm fabs.
How the EU chooses to support the semiconductor industry through the coming years is being evaluated by the study, industry players and policymakers throughout the region. There are clear divergences of interests across the industry: European IC manufacturers are currently not planning 450 mm investments; many equipment and materials suppliers see an opportunity, but many suppliers see the 450 R&D draw threatening long-term profitability and current customers. Similarly, European consortia and R&D organizations see both an opportunity and a threat as—unlike current 300 mm process development which occurs at multiple locations around the globe—near-term 450 development seems likely to be exclusively conducted at the G450C site in New York. Kelm acknowledged the prominence of
different views on government support for More- Than Moore, and More Moore programs and the challenges 450 will make on current semiconductor and high-tech policy. With $2-3 billion necessary for a stake in a 450 development fab capability, it is unclear whether both wafer size transition, next node scaling, new transistor technology, and 3D IC could be simultaneously be funded. With 450 demanding such a large resource commitment, it is also unclear how semiconductor industry support will fare among all European Key Enabling Technologies (biotechnology, advanced materials, photonics, etc.).
Michel Brillouet, Senior Advisor, CEA-LETI, who estimated the total cost for 450 wafer size conversion to reach as high as $40 billion, summarized the EU options: help develop 450 and forget all More-than-Moore projects; forget 450 and concentrate on other process technologies such as 3D, EUV, etc; and support R&D by equipment and material suppliers without a European production or pilot development lab.
Effective Migration: Affordable and On-Time?
Hans Lebon, VP Fab & Process Step Development at IMEC, began his presentation with the statement that “wafer size transition
25
www.euroasiasemiconductor.com Issue V 2011
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30