This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
9


Weigh Cost Tradeoffs


Weigh the cost benefits of post-casting machining vs. casting to specifications with die core slides.


One of diecasting’s major strengths is its use of core slides to produce parts to final dimensional specifications as-cast. In many cases, the added investment in such tooling is more than offset by the unit cost savings in eliminating all, or virtually all, high-cost post-casting machining. Such tooling decisions, however, should always be made with a careful cost-benefit analysis. For example, depending on the final design of a feature, side-action core slides may double the number of parting lines. Tis could result in stepped parting lines with increased part trimming costs. CNC machining after casting may be the better bottom- line option in these cases. For smaller parts, the unit die tooling alternative (as discussed in No. 8), combined with post-casting machining as required, should be considered.


Superfluous print dimensions can lead to confusion, errors and higher processing costs.


10 Prints destined for toolmaking must contain all relevant part specifications for


diecasting production, post-casting machining and finishing, plus references to mating parts and their specific requirements. But irrelevant dimensions will slow the approval process and may lead to production errors. Prints should be stripped of such irrelevant dimensions and notations prior to submission for diecasting quotations and die design. Appropriate, clear print dimensioning will help ensure production repeatability and


reduce inspection time. For improved dimensional accuracy and repeatability in die cast parts, datum points should always be kept on the same side of the diecasting die.


Avoid the Superfluous


Minimize post-casting machining costs by proper hole dimensioning and placement on prints.


11 Engineers less familiar with the


requirements of the diecasting process often size and place part features in ways that entail significant additional post-casting machining costs, as well as longer casting cycles, if not modified. Hole sizes should be appropriately


dimensioned for the alloy selected, part size and length-to-diameter ratio of the hole. Preplanning hole spacing for efficient secondary machining can cut secondary costs. For example, speci- fication for 0.625-in. (15.875-mm) spacing between drilled and tapped holes can allow single set-up conven- tional machining with multiple spin- dles for lowest cost operation. Where the design will allow, more robust part features always yield superior results in post-casting operations.


12


Let Hard Facts Cut Costs


Refined casting analyses may assure meeting part specs at significantly reduced costs.


When analytical data demon-


strates stringent specifications can be met with alternative production solutions, saving production costs, such results should be evaluated by OEM engineering. For example, in the case of electronic


enclosures designed for assured elec- tromagnetic interference (EMI)/radio frequency interference (RFI) shielding, radiographic analysis of die cast housings, backed by EMI/RFI leakage testing, can establish threshold parameters for minute discontinuities in a die casting in relation to shielding effectiveness. Tese discontinuities in a casting’s micro-struc- ture can result from metal flow caused by unusual design features. Analysis of the parts has determined that when data for the castings fall above established threshold parameters, shielding integrity can be assured at specified levels. If parts can be produced at higher production rates, substantial unit cost savings can result. ■


32 | METAL CASTING DESIGN & PURCHASING | Sept/Oct 2011


Employ Holes Properly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60