This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Left, ‘The Beguiling of Merlin’, one the radical new works Burne-Jones exhibited at the groundbreaking Grosvenor Gallery exhibition in May 1877. The SPAB’s inaugural meeting two months earlier was probably not in the artist’s mind. The modern art sensation of its time, the exhibition marked a break from the Royal Academy’s stranglehold over painting. Above, Burne-Jones at his easel, self-parody c1885. Below, the artist sketched by George Howard around the time of the SPAB’s foundation


been aware of the ongoing crassness of the restoration. He had reported indignantly to Ruskin that already the whole north side of the cathedral had been “covered up and peeled off”. He feared that soon the only record of the original building would be the 15th-century Bellini painting Procession in Piazza San Marco, in the Accademia.


through her, was successful in enlisting the Liberal leader’s support. He told her: “It is such cursed work – so needless, so stupid, such devilry in short… A modern Homer wouldn’t be more useless, empty, and hateful to your father than the mockery of St. Mark’s will make to me. Do ask your father what is best to do.’” The Homer-loving Gladstone was amongst 2,000 signatories on the petition of protest


W


hen it came to the SPAB protest over St Mark’s, 17 years later, Burne-Jones took an active part. He was a friend of Gladstone’s daughter Mary and,


against the “restorations” which was sent to the Italian government. Burne-Jones was also prevailed upon by


Morris to be one of the six speakers at the SPAB St Mark’s campaign meeting held in the Sheldonian Theatre in Oxford. Usually he resisted public speaking and – apart from an embarrassing appearance at theWhistler vs Ruskin libel trial – this was the only time he ever spoke in public. Reportedly, Burne-Jones’s delivery was terrible. He muttered and he mumbled. But his sentiments were heartfelt. The whole idea of restoring ancient architecture was preposterous: “Who would think of restoring lost fragments to poetry, or of completing the Iliad?” Burne-Jones believed as passionately as


Morris in the supreme importance of buildings to a nation’s culture in providing a kind of moral yardstick. He reacted to architecture with abnormal sensitivity. “I wonder,” he asked, “if there are many in the world who are exhilarated by good architecture as I am – or crushed by bad ... Nothing in the whole world, in the visible world, affects me so much.” What were the types of building Burne-Jones


Cornerstone, Vol 32, No 3 2011 89


BRIDGEMAN


COURTESY THE CASTLE HOWARD COLLECTION


PRIVATE COLLECTION/BRIDGEMAN


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112