This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Roost neversleeps


An especially fine and rare Shropshire dovecote dating from the Cromwellian period has recently been repaired by Donald Insall Associates and its partners. Conservation architect Sarah Butler reports


I


n themedieval period and through to the 17th century, dovecotes played an important part in the economy of country estates. Along with fishponds, deer parks and rabbit warrens, they provided a reliable source of food; and their by-productswere highly prized as fertiliser and as a key component of gunpowder. The importance of dovecotes to manorial life was


often reflected in their sophisticated architectural design,which led to their becoming status symbols that reflected the wealth of a country estate. Hodnet’s dovecote is located on raised ground and


forms a focal point in the deer park of the Heber-Percy family’s historic estate near Market Drayton, Shropshire. Its size and the articulation of its simple traditional form express the symbolic importance attached to its construction. Richly embellished with stone dressings and patterned brick recesses picked out inwhite render, the principal north elevation is enhancedwith three decorative arches. The central arch has rich terracotta relief and the inscription “TM 1656 IM”,whilst another recess has the “lion rampant” from the Vernon coat of arms. The north door, typically Tudor, is a plank door with iron strap hinges. By themid-19th century, the dovecote had been


adapted to serve as a cow byre. A large, segmental- headed opening had been formed in the south elevation, originally fitted with a door; and the north door had been bricked up. A loft floor was introduced, with the nest boxes retained in the upper level, whilst


the lower nest boxes at ground level were infilled. It is likely that the brick floor may have been introduced at this time, as the arrangement of drainage channels falls towards the south door. Its designation as a scheduled monument and


grade II* listing indicates the importance of this building. It is a classic example of a mid-17th century symbol of high social status and of the specialised structural formof this building type. A pencil sketch by Stanley Leighton, dated 1863,


shows the north-east viewof the dovecote with larger sketch details of the central arch and “lion rampant”. Despite the 1850s changes, the use of the building by


animal stock, and subsequent 1950s repairs, the dovecote survives remarkably well, with its design intent intact and architectural features clearly evident, although weathered. Donald Insall Associates acted as lead consultants


for the repair and renovation of the building, assisted by structural engineers Frank Haywood Associates, NJL Consultant Ecologists and John Pidgeon Partnership as CDM co-ordinator. The principalworks were funded by Natural England, and EnglishHeritage was closely involved in the consultation process because of the building’s Scheduled Monument status. A local conservation contractor, IJ Preece, carried out theworks. Our conservation objectives and approachwere to


preserve and repair those elements of the fabric and fittings that are of historic significance; ensure conservation works were specified and undertaken in accordance with best practice, using traditional materials and methods appropriate to the relevant historic period of construction; remove recent interventions which were having a negative impact on the heritage values of the site; bring the building back into a sound condition to ensure longevity in survival; and to take care that proposals to adapt or alter details protected the heritage fabric. Repairs were categorised as essential, necessary, or


The south doorway, brick floor and blocked nesting boxes of the cow byre portion Hodnet Dovecote, after conservation


desirable. Essential repairs were related to structure, excessive weathering and health and safety issues. Structurally, the principal concernswere the


Cornerstone, Vol 32, No 3 2011 41


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112