This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Single Bacterial Cell Surfaces


Figure 3: AFM 3-D height image of the S. meliloti wild-type-strain Rm2011, fixed, dried, and imaged in air. The whole bacterial surface is covered with protrusions that show an elongated and wrinkled structure closely connected. Scan size = 4.5 µm × 4.5 µm.


Switching from SEM to AFM, similar surface patterns


became visible using AFM under ambient conditions. In this nanomechanical probing technique, a tiny tip scans the topology of the surface. Tis provides surface imaging of fixed and dried bacterial cells without metal coating or vacuum. In the AFM image shown in Figure 3, we found that the bacterial surface is completely decorated with a dense network of surface protrusions (12.1 ± 4.9 nm heights, 26 ± 6 nm lateral diameters and 72 ± 28 nm lengths). A quantitative comparison of the observed patterns


from XHR SEM and AFM is difficult because SEM suffers from beam penetration and interaction volume effects, and AFM can suffer from tip-convolution effects. However, the estimated values determined by AFM are in good agreement with the XHR SEM data. So the AFM results confirm that the structures are actually present on the cell surface and not part of sub-surface structures. In order to evaluate pos-


sible drying artifacts, AFM images were taken of fixed S. meliloti bacteria in PBS buffer (see Figure 4). Under these conditions the protru- sions appear mostly round- shaped with a height of 4.7 ± 2.7 nm and a lateral diameter of 33 ± 8 nm. Next, the fixation was


omitted to analyze living bac- teria. Te bacteria exhibited protrusions of a height of 3.9 ± 1.7 nm and a width of 28 ± 6 nm (see Figures 5 and 6). Te dimensions are similar


to chemically fixed


bacteria. In consequence, the observed structures are not artifacts caused by the fixation


24 Figure 5: AFM 3-D height image of the S. meliloti wild-type-strain Rm2011, living bacterium in culture medium. Protrusions can be recognized, positioned closely together on the bacterial surface. Scan size = 1 µm × 2 µm. www.microscopy-today.com • 2011 September


procedure but naturally occurring features on the outer bacterial envelope.


Discussion No obvious change in surface morphology could be


observed comparing bacteria imaged with AFM in liquid with and without fixation (Figures 4 and 5). Drying, however, changes the morphology, although no patterns are generated de novo. On dried bacteria, the observed patterns are more wave-like instead of round protrusions found on cell surfaces imaged by AFM in liquid (see AFM in air, Figure 3; XHR SEM, Figure 2; and SEM Figure 1). Tere are several possible mechanisms for wrinkle formation. One possibility is the wrinkling of the outer membrane during drying. A second possibility is


the formation of elongated wrinkles by the


Figure 4: AFM 3-D images of the topography of the S. meliloti wild-type-strain Rm2011, fixed and imaged in PBS buffer. The bacterial surface is completely decorated with round protrusions. Scan size = 2.5 µm × 2.5 µm.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84