This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Imaging Biologically Induced Mineralization


induced mineralization processes and aided our ability to understand and ultimately control


Glass capillary flow systems, previously


the overall process. used


in our


Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the 2-dimensional reactor with a network of 1 mm pores. Flow moved from left to right across the system. The bacteria were introduced through the injection port, and the effluent samples were extracted through the sample port for chemical and biological analyses. (b) Photograph of the reactor under observation by the Nikon SMZ 1500 stereo microscope during biomineralization experiment.


laboratory, were used for this purpose (Figure 4) [6]. Te 0.17 mm thick glass walls allow for non-invasive CLSM. Te Leica TCS-SP2 AOBS confocal microscope employing a Leica 63× water immersion lens (2 mm working distance) was used. Imaris image-analysis soſtware (Bitplane Scientific Soſtware, St. Paul, MN) was used to compile the z-stacks into 3-dimensional images. Aſter the system was run


for 2 days and visible minerals had formed, fluorescent stains were applied to the reactors


to differentiate the various components. In the first study, SYTO-11 and C2-dichlorotriazine (C2d) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) were used. C2d (red) is expected to bind to alcohols, polysaccharides, and amines (invitrogen.com) and thus reveal the compounds most likely associated with the extracellular matrix; SYTO-11 (green) is a nucleic acid stain that is expected to bind to bacterial cells. Figure 5 shows several images of cells and extracellular


matrix surrounding what appear to be mineral precipitates (calcite). Te cells appear to be attached preferentially to the calcite surface over the glass surface. Figure 5a displays a stack of CLSM images at low magnification. Te image spans the whole width (1 mm) of the capillary flow cell and shows clusters of cells and matrix surrounding dark areas (filled with calcite mineral). Figure 5b shows a three-dimensional reconstruction of clusters of bacteria and extracellular polymeric substances, which, as seen in Figures 5c and 5d, surround areas without fluorescence suggesting that calcium carbonate precipitates


Figure 2: Selected stereomicroscopy images taken from above the reactor and focused on mineral formation on the interior surface of the glass cover slip. (a) Inlet region showing the greatest degree of biomineralization, (b) 2 cm into the reactor, (c) 5 cm into the reactor, and (d) outlet region (approx. 8 cm into the reactor). Note the size gradient from inlet to outlet. Images such as these provided the data for size, density, and solubility calculations as a function of reactor location and retention time.


solubility increased with distance into the porous media reactor because of the larger free surface energy of the smaller crystals. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM). Te


large-scale processes observed by stereo microscopy and chemical analysis of the flow medium at the outlet of the reactor are ultimately dictated by processes that occur on a much smaller scale, demanding the ability to visualize microbe-mineral


interactions on a smaller scale. Confocal


laser scanning microscopy provided higher-resolution differentiation of the components involved in the biologically


2011 September • www.microscopy-today.com


Figure 3: Estimated crystal solubility constant (KsO) as a function of the estimated crystal surface area based on image analysis. Calculations were performed using the methods outlined by Stumm et al. [5] and Mitchell and Ferris [2].


13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84