This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
HYDRONICS e Continued from p 50


thermal energy from the home and puts it directly into my water heater during the summer months,” said Waltermire. “The result is that I basically have ‘free’ hot water from May through September or October.” “Whenever I’m dealing with our


Inside the Waltermire home. Among the factors Waltermire 52


looks for in recommending heating and cooling systems to Midwest Electric’s member/contractor base, as well as for evaluating his own system, is efficiency. And Waltermire calculates efficiency on a no-nonsense basis of sound cost/benefit analysis. “I work with commercial customers,


and I also work with residential members, advising them on energy efficient heating and cooling systems,” Waltermire said. “Even standard model geothermal systems are many times more efficient than traditional HVAC systems.”


Unexpected energy savings To be sure, he installed a


submeter to separately monitor electric draw for the geothermal system and domestic water heating. Validating the investment he made in his own home, Waltermire offers some very impressive numbers. “Over the six-month period right


after I set the electric meter at zero and started up the geothermal equipment, the system used 3,265 kilowatt-hours,” said Waltermire.


“At that time, Midwest Electric had a standard rate of 7½ cents per kwh. It cost me $245 to heat my house and to provide domestic water for those six months, through the entire heating season. On average, we now spend $350 a year for all electricity use within the home.” Waltermire relates that about two


years ago he met a member who has a house that’s comparably sized and was built about the same time as his.


“He shared with me that his natural gas hot water/boiler system, which is exactly what my house had originally, required a $256 a month budget. Basically, he pays $11 more for only one month on a 12-month basis than I just paid for the entire six-month heating season. If I stretch it out over a year, comparing


my system to his, I’m seeing a return of greater than 90 percent.”


Open loop or closed loop? Another interesting point of


discussion revolves around the reasons Waltermire selected an open loop water well “pump-and-dump” system over a more traditional closed loop arrangement. “It’s important to understand that


it’s the same theory, whether you have a closed loop or an open loop; just different mechanics,” Waltermire said. “The theory is based on the fact that at a certain depth, maybe around five feet in my area, the earth’s temperature stabilizes year- round at about 54 to 55 degrees.” Any water at that depth or below


will be in the same temperature range. That’s where the ground-to- water heat exchange process takes place. Water circulated within the system taps the earth’s abundant thermal energy, is warmed in the winter and cooled in the summer. Yet, while outdoor air temperatures swing wildly, underground temperatures, the source of geothermal energy, remain stable. In a closed loop geothermal


system, water or special antifreeze solution is sealed in to circulate within the geo-exchange loops. The solution is pumped from the loops to a condensing unit, where thermal energy is efficiently exchanged with compressed, non-ozone-depleting refrigerant. That energy is then used to heat or cool the home, with the added benefit of availed heat for domestic water use. “But with an open loop system


like ours, we pull water from a well at water-table depth, bring it up to exchange the thermal energy and then pump it back into another well, placing the clean, unchanged water back into the water table. My system’s desuperheater takes the


Midwest Electric members, probably 95 percent of the time my suggested method on loop installation is a closed loop ground system or a closed loop pond system,” he said. “The reason I went with an open loop system is because my home is located directly over a huge underground aquifer called the Teays River, which dates back to before the last Ice Age. It saved us a lot on the cost of deeper drilling or ground excavation, which we would have had to do had the river not been there.” Although Waltermire himself feels


very strongly about the benefits of geothermal heating and cooling systems, he admits that taking the geothermal route on a home retrofit isn’t necessarily for everyone. The


The only time geothermal is not practical on a retrofit basis is when the house can’t be remodeled in a cost effective way to allow the system to be put in. But he has no qualms about recommending geothermal when the situation is right.


only time geothermal is not practical on a retrofit basis is when the house can’t be remodeled in a cost effective way to allow the system to be put in. But he has no qualms about recommending geothermal when the situation is right. “By encouraging the installation of


geothermal systems, we achieve a couple of very important things,” Waltermire said. “We save a lot of energy, and that’s important to our nation. We reduce our foreign energy dependency. And we also do something that’s good for the environment, which is beneficial for generations to come. It’s hard to imagine a greater ‘win/win.’” l


phc may 2011 www.phcnews.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164