This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The importance of evidence regard-


ing malicious treatment of other similarly situated people was recently confirmed by the Second District Court of Appeal, which interpreted Roby and held that a higher ratio of punitive damages to com- pensatory damages was not warranted because,


Regarding the fourth reprehensibility


factor of whether the conduct involved repeated actions or was an isolated inci- dent,… [t]here was no evidence presented that Mercury acted similarly toward other insureds in similar circumstances. Thus, on the evidence before us we cannot con- clude that Mercury was a ‘repeat offender.’


(Amerigraphics, Inc. v. Mercury Cas. Co. (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 1538, 1563 [107 Cal.Rptr.3d 307] [Italics added].)


The lesson taught by the Roby,


Johnson, Mendelsohn, and State Farm deci- sions, is the need for extensive discovery into the effect of illegal corporate policies and/or practices not just on the plaintiff but on other employees as well. The ideal discovery plan for attorneys representing employees should target evidence of other victims of similar unlawful conduct to that complained of by the plaintiff. In particular, Roby opens the door to


discovery into other victims working at dif- ferent locations under different supervi- sors as such evidence would be essential to prove that the harm suffered by the plain- tiff was “the product of a corporate culture that encouraged similar supervisorial conduct.” In other words, when you combine these cases, you now have support to seek evi- dence regarding how other supervisors at


other locations treated their employees to show the particular supervisor’s conduct at issue was evidence of a larger corporate culture encouraging and condoning such conduct. Needless to say, if discovery in an individual case supports an inference of a discriminatory “corporate culture” con- doning widespread and systematic discrim- ination, many single-plaintiff cases may morph into class actions. (See, e.g., Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (9th Cir. 2010) 603 F.3d 571, 612 (affirming grant of class certification based on finding evidence of “Wal-Mart’s centralized firm-wide culture and policies.”)


Roby/harassment claims Roby also represents the most signifi-


cant expansion of hostile work-environment harassment law in at least a generation. The


EMPLOYMENT MEDIATORS


www.adrservices.org Century City


1900 Ave. of the Stars Ste. 250


310.201.0010 lucie@adrservices.org


Downtown Los Angeles 915 Wilshire Blvd. Ste. 1900


213.683.1600


terry@adrservices.org Irvine


949.863.9800 jessie@adrservices.org


San Diego 619.233.1323 gen@adrservices.org


Hon. Enrique Romero (Ret.)


Jan Schau, Esq.


Hon. Robert Thomas (Ret.)


Caroline Vincent, Esq.


Hon. John Zebrowski (Ret.) APRIL 2011 The Advocate Magazine — 83


Michael Diliberto, Esq.


Hon. Joe Hilberman (Ret.)


Joan Kessler, Esq.


Hon. Michael Marcus (Ret.)


Peter Marx, Esq.


Hon. Robert Altman (Ret.)


Eleanor Barr, Esq.


Linda Bulmash, Esq.


Hon. Patricia Collins (Ret.)


Robert Coviello, Esq.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112