This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
From the President Philip Michels


Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles


People’s protests in the mideast and the midwest: Back to the streets


As I write this column, protests have


been ongoing for weeks over a Republican bill in Wisconsin that would strip most public-sector workers of collec- tive bargaining rights, reduce municipal funding of pension and healthcare bene- fits and lessen oversight of state contracts with outside corporations. Coming on the heels of the people’s


protests in the Mideast that shook the power structures in Libya, Tunisia and Bahrain and resulted in the fall of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, commentators and jour- nalists are turning their coverage to domestic protests against radical changes proposed by newly elected Republican governors and legislators. These are Republican attacks on


working people and especially on the unions that represent public sector employees. But, like the attacks on trial lawyers that were part of the so-called “tort reform” movement that began dur- ing the Bush Administration, there are two clear motives on the part of Conservatives.


Reward the rich, defund the Dems The first is what New York Times


columnist Frank Rich reported on February 27 when he wrote, “The real goal is to reward the G.O.P’s wealthiest patrons by crippling what remains of organized labor, by wrecking the govern- ment agencies charged with regulating and policing corporations, and as always, by rewarding the wealthiest with more tax breaks.” The second motive is to de-fund the


Democratic Party. Do not think for one minute that


ongoing Republican attacks on trial lawyers and the current assault on unions and working people aren’t related. Both groups are strong financial supporters of Progressive politicians and both supply manpower to Democratic candidates.


108— The Advocate Magazine APRIL 2011 In Wisconsin, and many other states,


the mid-term election resulted in a super majority for Republicans in the legisla- ture, leaving Democrats in the state Senate with no choice but to block the Governor’s proposal by fleeing the state, thus preventing a quorum from assem- bling.


The ostensible justification for the


Wisconsin bill was the state’s large budget deficit and the supposed relatively lush benefits of municipal employees – teach- ers, prison guards, park rangers, and all but police and firefighters, in excess of those to private-sector workers. However, the real purpose of the bill is to gut the political force of the middle-class state workers. It is part of the GOP-led nation- wide campaign to dismantle union power and solidify Republican control of the upper Midwest. Similar union busting efforts are underway in Ohio, Indiana and Pennsylvania. Republicans now hold five of the


seven Midwest governorships, [up from two last year], six of the seven lower leg- islative chambers [up from one last year] and five of the seven state senates. “Americans for Prosperity,” a right-wing front organization, has a budget of $40 million to fund alleged “grass-roots” cam- paigns like this in Wisconsin and 31 other states. In addition to breaking the unions, the group has the usual Republican agen- da of opposing the health care law, limit- ing spending by government and gutting environmental regulation. Its biggest con- tributors by far are the billionaire Koch brothers. The Kochs were also one of the biggest contributors to the election cam- paign of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker.


The reality of the public-private issue


is far different than advertised. Studies by the Economic Policy Institute and others have shown that, when controlled for edu- cation, experience, ethnicity and so forth,


public sector workers earn less than com- parable private sector ones. College-edu- cated public workers are paid 25 percent less than those working in the private sec- tor.


The proposed Wisconsin budget bill


also has hidden in its 144 pages another power grab. It would allow officials appointed by the Governor to cut health care coverage for low income families without legislative approval, to sell any state-owned power plant or contract with a private entity to operate one without solicitation of bids or legislative approval, for any amount the official deems appro- priate; by law such amount and such transaction would be deemed “in the pub- lic interest”. The cynical irony of foisting the


deficit dilemma onto the backs of middle- class workers is that it was not the middle class that caused the problem. The right is trying to exploit the very crisis it helped create. Where is talk about Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and the Greenspan Federal Reserve? Where is talk about the rising income inequality between the rich and the rest? Where is the talk about tax relief for the greedy, not the needy? Of decades of stagnant income growth of the middle class? Of the rising cost of housing, health care, fuel, education? Of more and more fami- lies living from paycheck to paycheck, stuck with worthless homes and mounting debts? It is no wonder that support for the


demonstrators has been coming from around the world. The arrogance of power resonates in Cairo, Tripoli, Bahrain. It may not be in the form of the Koch brothers’ millions, but dreams can be deferred only so long. It is back to the streets.





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112