MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
origins in the fastening industry, so the desire to form threads was there right from the start. A wide variety of approaches to tackling
this problem can be found in publications. But most of them are hard to implement because of the complexity of the tools or the processes or the faults that developed while producing the threads. One system that became accepted
involved using clamping tools, particularly in order to produce reductions in the cross sections in the centre of components – for example, ball pins. The jaws are clamped around the thin cross section and this allows the remaining material to be compressed into a thicker cross section or moulded in the jaws. The jaws are then opened to release the component. A similar process is used when pressing
outer threads. The crucial difference is that the jaws form the thread when they close and the blank was previously forged in such a way at the points where the jaws close that no material can slip into the clamping gap of the jaws when the unit is closed. See Fig. 1.
Formed threads I
t may sound amazing, but it really is true. The idea is so simple that the question must be asked: Why did it take so long? Steel forging had its
Hall: 6 Stand: M141
Hard to believe? Well it stopped and made us think - so we asked Sieber Forming Solutions to put the case for a radically different approach to manufacturing threaded parts.
These blank cross sections illustrate
a variety of possibilities in this field. It is important to note that no material can get into the clamping points of the jaws. The diameter of the blanks is larger when pressing than when rolling – if compared to cross section forms that are then rolled. The main reason for this is that the material also flows into the relief notches when being pressed. So we recommend that the cross
section for the blank is discovered by using simulation software. The relief notch for the blank is visible
on the thread at the ends. Any weakening of the tensile strength of the cross section is almost negligible (1-2%). Fig. 2
Thread pitches can be formed just as
with tooth wheels, in order to be self- locking, they can be formed by oscillation like a spring in order to provide zero backlash or they can change their form and so change from pointed to round in order to allow screwing at an angle. The thread does not have to be cylindrical – the cross section can be a polygon, as is the case with self-tapping threads or other applications. One major difference in comparison with
rolling involves the forming of the crest of the thread. Fig. 4. The thread crests are always round and do not have any clamping marks. This means that there is no risk of people injuring themselves on unrolled profiles, the threads are very much less sensitive to impact and are better suited for coatings at the tips.
Fig. 4: Contrast between threads formed by forming and rolling.
It is possible to combine several
threads or threads with knurls or splines. When forming knurls or splines, for example, three dies, three teeth or tooth crests are used. Fig. 5.
Fig. 2: Thread forming at a jaw clamping point. It is also conceivable to deviate from
Fig. 1: Blank form when pressing threads. The cross section of the blank can
be formed from a circle with side relief notches. In this case, the outer sides of the jaws first bite into the blank. But the cross section can also be formed from three circles. In this case, the jaws immediately come into contact with almost the complete inner profile (thread profile).
the standard circular feature of the thread on a component; the thread or feature can be conical or be combined with any other shapes. This process opens up completely new design options in addition to milling, rolling or cutting. Fig. 3 illustrates some design ideas.
Fig. 5: Formed knurls. This concept is not just used
Fig. 3: Variations of formed threads. 84 Fastener + Fixing Magazine • Issue 67 January 2011
for forming outer threads on solid components, but also hollow ones. In this process, a material is pressed into the closed jaws with a mandrel. Fig. 6.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160 |
Page 161 |
Page 162 |
Page 163 |
Page 164 |
Page 165 |
Page 166 |
Page 167 |
Page 168 |
Page 169 |
Page 170 |
Page 171 |
Page 172 |
Page 173 |
Page 174 |
Page 175 |
Page 176 |
Page 177 |
Page 178 |
Page 179 |
Page 180 |
Page 181 |
Page 182 |
Page 183 |
Page 184 |
Page 185 |
Page 186 |
Page 187 |
Page 188