This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
THE LAST WORD


N Beyond cancer


ew figures from the National Cancer Intelligence Network


tell us that people with a diagnosis of cancer are living longer. This is undoubtedly good news. There are currently two million people living with a cancer diagnosis. This figure is increasing at a rate of 3% per year so that by 2030, if the current rate continues, the number will have doubled to four million people. As survival rates change, so must the way we support people affected by cancer.


At the moment we have a hospital-based follow up surveillance system after treatment but this isn’t meeting the needs of cancer survivors. According to the Department of Health, half of all people with long term conditions, including cancer, were not aware of treatment options and did not have a clear plan to help them manage their condition better. This is in contrast to what people want. A recent Macmillan poll of the general public found that 89 per cent would expect a personalised care plan.


What happens now is that when treatment ends so does coordinated support, leaving many survivors feeling abandoned. And the current surveillance system is not the best way to detect recurrence. For example, in a study of breast cancer patients in Cornwall, only 15% of recurrences were detected at routine follow up whilst 48% were first noticed by patients themselves.


The current system is also costly. On average, each cancer outpatient visit costs £106. Emergency or unplanned


88 nhe


admissions are a significant pressure in the NHS – where patients do not recognise symptoms needing urgent treatment hospitalisation may result at a cost of £340 a night. In contrast, preventative visits to an appropriately trained surgery-based nurse would cost significantly less . A more efficient aftercare system would help patients themselves to detect problems earlier at a much lower cost and not make people wait until their next scheduled appointment.


Not only is the current system not always the best way to meet its primary purpose of detection of recurrence; it doesn’t address the many other problems cancer survivors experience.


Often there is potential for longer-term impacts on physical health. In some cases treatments are associated with side effects which can develop years after treatment. In other cases, health risks such as heart disease can be increased. This means that approximately one in five people living after treatment for cancer will develop significant long- term emotional, psychological and physical problems that seriously affect their quality of life. Again, these issues are often not addressed.


The reality is that cancer survivors need help getting their life back on track. People affected by cancer need to make sure they are able to manage financially and will want to get back to work.


Cancer specific financial support and advice leading to increased income can be associated with improvements in levels of exhaustion and mental health


Given that cancer is no longer a death sentence, we need to make sure that people who are living with, or beyond, cancer are able to lead full lives in which their condition is effectively managed, says Ciaran Devine


issues. People using Macmillan funded advice services experience less stress, which in turn aids recovery.


This, too, provides savings. Research has found that the average cost to the NHS of ‘difficult to solve’ debt problems that led to physical or stress- related ill-health was around £50 (£20 per debt problem in general). Financial support and advice results in people with long-term conditions such as cancer using the health service less. This includes fewer visits to the GP, fewer prescriptions, fewer new drugs prescribed and fewer visits to A&E.


Many people with cancer return to work without any information or advice – fewer than 50% of patients are advised by cancer doctors about the impact of treatment on their work. The kinds of information that can be useful for people with cancer include, how their ability to work might be affected, how to manage their condition, when they might expect to be ready to return to work and what rights they have under the Disability Discrimination Act and the forthcoming Equality Act.


But it’s not just information and advice that’s needed. We also want to see vocational rehabilitation offered to every cancer survivor who needs it. Examples of the services this can include are physiotherapy, counselling, retraining, employee advocacy and workplace assessments or adjustments.


All this adds up to the need for a far more comprehensive aftercare system. The National Cancer Survivorship Initiative, a joint venture with Macmillan


and the Department of Health, is leading the way in looking at what this new system needs to offer.


We believe any new system should offer a post-treatment assessment looking at all the potential long-term consequences of the cancer and its treatment and how this may impact upon a person’s life.


Under Macmillan’s suggested new model, everyone reaching the end of treatment would be offered an assessment by an appropriately trained professional such as a specialist doctor or nurse to identify the patient’s needs and any risk of future problems or disability. Under such a regime, care planning for the majority would take the form of supported self- care with quick access back into the system if and when needed.


This has the potential of preventing complications, slowing down deterioration and avoiding further complications. Managed care is about adopting a healthy lifestyle which prevents as far as possible escalation of any ongoing problems and occurrence of any future problems. It is also about detecting reoccurrence or problems caused by the previous cancer as early as possible rather than waiting for the next scheduled appointment.


If cancer survivors are given effective education, support, intervention and management then this could significantly improve their health and well being. Holistic assessment and care planning would also lead to improved patient experience and save the NHS money in the long term.


Sep/Oct 10


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92