This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
load cell was carefully calibrated to measure the loading force, F. With this data, the stress σ, strain ε, and elastic modulus E, were calculated from the following three-point bend equations7


: Equation 1 and Equation 2 thus Equation 3 Results


where L is the support span, b is the specimen width as viewed by the loading head, and d is the specimen depth as viewed by the loading head.


In a typical test, a specimen was placed into the three- point bend apparatus and several measurements of the elastic modulus were first performed at room temperature. The load was kept well below that necessary to break the specimen. Then, the oven was turned on and the oven control system was set such that the temperature of the specimen increased at an approximately constant rate. The heating rate is one of the experimental variables in the present study. Approximately once every minute dur- ing heating (for a heating rate of 8C/min [14.4F/min]), the specimen was loaded and unloaded in order to measure the elastic modulus as a function of temperature. Again, the maximum load was kept to a sufficiently low level that the specimen did not break. A certain minimum load was maintained in order to ensure good contact between the specimen and the loading head. A test concluded when the specimen reached a temperature of approxi- mately 500C (932F). At that temperature, the strength of the bonded sand vanishes because most of the binder has decomposed. Up to 80 elastic modulus measurements were performed in each test.


Validation


In order to validate the present experimental setup and mea- surement procedures, at both room temperature and elevated temperatures, tests were performed using a material with a well-known elastic modulus. The material chosen was ASTM 304 stainless steel. Figure 5 compares the present elastic modulus measurements with the measurements of Sakumoto et al.10


Good agreement can be observed at both


room temperature and 400C (752F). Error Analysis


A simple root-sum-squares (RSS) error analysis was per- formed to estimate the error in the present elastic modulus


International Journal of Metalcasting/Fall 10


Figure 5. Comparison of present measurements of the elastic modulus of ASTM 304 stainless steel as a function of temperature with data from Sakumoto et al.10


11 Stress-Strain Curves


In order to obtain a few complete stress-strain curves, preliminary experiments were conducted in which the load was increased until the specimens broke. The speci- mens were heated from room temperature to the desired test temperature at a rate of 8C/min (14.4F/min). Once the specimens reached the test temperature, the load was increased immediately without any further change in the temperature. Representative stress-strain curves at four different test temperatures are provided in Figure 6. A straight line was fit to the elastic portion of the stress- strain curves, with the slope representing the measured elastic modulus.


measurements. Table 2 shows the sources of error in the individual measurements for a room temperature example. For the specimen deflection and the loading force, only the largest measured values (in the elastic regime) are listed. Table 3 shows the resulting ranges and errors in the elas- tic modulus. It can be seen that the measurement of the specimen deflection is the single largest source of error. The specimen width measurement is also a relatively large source of error, which can be attributed to the roughness of the top surface of the bonded sand specimens. Overall, the error in the present room temperature elastic modulus measurement is estimated to be ±1.5%. A similar accuracy can be expected at elevated temperatures.

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85