This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
125


after stopping for one weekend because of concerns about the legality of their businesses. However, Macau Cable TV still admits the possibility of “taking legal procedures” against these companies. The question of the broadcasts’ legality depends on


Ref’s indecision is fi nal T


he providers of public antenna broadcasts resumed relaying English Premier League matches last month,


the interpretation of the difference between terrestrial and cable television broadcasting. Government-owned TV station TDM, which bought the


rights to terrestrial broadcasts of Premier League games, says its contract allows public antenna broadcasters to relay the football matches, while Macau Cable TV has the exclusive rights to paid cable TV broadcasts. Although TDM is a terrestrial broadcaster, most viewers


receive terrestrial broadcasts through public antenna services that use unlicensed local cable networks. They charge much less than Macau Cable TV and include relays of Hong Kong, mainland and foreign channels in their services. In reply to a Macau Business enquiry, the chief


commercial offi cer of Macau Cable TV, John Chiang, confi rmed that the exclusive rights of his company cover only paid cable television. “They [TDM] have free TV, don’t charge anything. They transmit it on air. This is their right. There is no problem. We are not against TDM,” he said. At issue is the practice of the public antenna services


relaying TDM’s signal through unlicensed local cable networks. “We just want local public antenna providers not to use their cable networks. This is our right,” Mr Chiang said. Indirectly, the government has backed the public


antenna service providers, invoking the need to protect the public interest by allowing people to watch TDM programmes. The public antenna service providers argue they are


not broadcasting the matches but providing the technical means for TDM programming to reach people’s homes.


“It’s a small community in terms of


media industry,” he notes, which means fewer potential customers among whom to split the technology costs. However, he assures the company is “looking at more innovative, cost-friendly prices”. Besides the hitch with television


content, CTM also faces a “lack of clar- ity in the regulatory framework”, says Aguinaldo Wahnon, the company’s vice-president of


legal and regulatory


matters. “It’s an old legal framework and it doesn’t give the necessary guarantees to investors.” Mr Wahnon says there are grey are-


as in the legislation about the regulation of Internet protocol television that make investment riskier. From a technological standpoint “we see a business opportunity”, Mr


Shaw notes. He argues that CTM has strong support from investors, adding that Portugal Telecom, one of the com- pany’s major shareholders, already has experience in this area.


Timing is everything The government is aware of CTM’s moves. “The government was impressed with the technology showed but pointed out the timing,” comments Mr Wahnon, referring to Macau Cable TV’s exclusive concession that runs out in April 2014. In a written reply to questions from


Macau Business, the Bureau of Tel- ecommunications Regulation said the Internet was a liberalised service in Macau, while paid cable TV services were still the exclusive preserve of the concessionaire.


The bureau did not rule out the


possibility of a bundled television, In- ternet and phone service but it did not say when that might be possible. “A con- verged service is yet to emerge with full liberalisation of the markets and market- driven demand for convergence,” the bu- reau said. When asked about the possibility


of Macau Cable TV’s contract being re- vised or cancelled to enable that to hap- pen, the bureau simply stated: “The con- cession contract can be fi nished at any time within the concession period given various circumstances. The government will not preclude the possibility of early fi nishing of the contract if necessary, but due consideration will be given to the market development and the evaluation of other alternatives.”


OCTOBER 2010


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com