WHAT IS ‘GENUINE INTEREST’? JURISDICTION REPORT: PERU
Alain Delion Estudio Delion
It is important for a brand to know when to demonstrate an interest in Andean opposition proceedings. Article 147 of the Andean Regulation says that during opposition proceedings, the owner of or applicant for a trademark previously filed in any of the Andean community countries (Ecuador, Colombia, Bolivia and Peru) has the right to file an opposition against any similar or identical trademark applied for in another Andean country.
It is important to determine whether ‘genuine interest’ is a static or a continuous act: is it enough just to apply for the trademark in the country where the opposition has been filed, or it is also necessary for the application to be maintained until the opposition is resolved.
Tis issue was raised in a recent case before the Peruvian Patent & Trademark Office (INDECOPI). It concerned an Andean opposition against a Peruvian application for registration, based on the grounds that an already registered Colombian trademark was identical to the applied-for Peruvian brand. In order to prove the Colombian owner’s genuine interest in the Peruvian market, he applied to register his trademark in Peru at the same moment as filing the opposition.
Recently, this application was declared abandoned, because the opposer would not be able to publish the mark in the Peruvian Gazette in due course.
For this reason, INDECOPI’s Distinctive Marks Commission declared the opposition unacceptable, on the basis that the abandonment of the Peruvian application meant that the interest requirement was not met.
Te opposer filed an appeal and INDECOPI’s Intellectual Property Board overturned the first instance decision, ordering the Distinctive Marks Commission to rule on the opposition case.
Te Board’s ruling is very useful for delimiting exactly the requirements of Article 147 of Decision 486. Genuine interest is proved only and exclusively at the filing date of the application of registration in the country where the opposition is carried out, whatever the future of the application.
It is justified because the opposition questions a specific fact: the registration of a trademark that could affect a third-party interest, whether it has been registered or previously filed. On the other hand, the text of Decision 486 says nothing about the future of the application used to prove genuine interest.
Te Intellectual Property Board correctly stated that: “In the case of the second condition, the norm states that the application, which demonstrates the genuine interest of the opposing party, must be filed at the same time
as the Andean opposition. We can note from the aforementioned norm that it does not state any additional condition; therefore, the fate of the application for registration (if it is denied, rejected or abandoned) would not determine the acceptability of the Andean opposition. In this sense, genuine interest must be considered demonstrated merely by filing an application of registration identical to the trademark that is the basis of the opposition, covering the same products or services.”
Finally, the ruling is an excellent precedent for intellectual property attorneys, because it clarifies the issues related to the filing of the Andean oppositions, specifying that genuine interest is exclusively proved when the relevant application is filed. Tis is healthy for the purposes of administering justice as well as for developing the market.
Alain C. Delion is an intellectual property partner of the international department at Estudio Delion. He can be contacted at:
acd@estudiodelion.com.pe
90 World Intellectual Property Review September/October 2010
www.worldipreview.com
“ ARTICLE 147 OF THE ANDEAN REGULATION SAYS THAT DURING OPPOSITION PROCEEDINGS, THE OWNER OF OR APPLICANT FOR A TRADEMARK PREVIOUSLY FILED IN ANY OF THE ANDEAN COMMUNITY COUNTRIES (ECUADOR, COLOMBIA, BOLIVIA AND PERU) HAS THE RIGHT TO FILE AN OPPOSITION AGAINST ANY SIMILAR OR IDENTICAL TRADEMARK APPLIED FOR IN ANOTHER ANDEAN COUNTRY."
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112