search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
America


billion in income to Ten- nessee


Why some states boom and others shrink.


Moving Van Economics


O BY JOHN FUND


ne of the big- gest cultural and demographic shifts in America


today is the decision of mil- lions of people to “vote with their feet” by moving across state lines.


Americans departing deep-blue liberal states choked by high taxes and red tape have taken with them hundreds of billions of dollars in personal income. Deep-red conservative


states with opposite eco- nomic policies are brim- ming with new economic activity. Texas and Florida have


been the big winners in this shift of population and busi- nesses, while New York and California are the big losers. A quarter century ago,


in 2000, New York and California had 52.9 million people and a clear lead in population over Texas and Florida, which together had a combined 36.9 million. Today, the Empire State


22 NEWSMAX | SEPTEMBER 2025


and the Golden State have a combined population of 59.7 million, just barely above Texas and Florida’s 56 million. “Starting in 2023, for the


first time in American his- tory, the Southeast is now the dominant production powerhouse rather than the Northeast,” says Stephen Moore, the president of Unleash Prosperity, a think tank that has just released a new website documenting the economic shift. The website VoteWith


YourFeet.net is a first-of- its-kind visual mapping project which tracks where residents and capital are relocating, using the latest available data from the IRS and U.S. Census Bureau.


A few minutes on the


website reveals just how real the decline of the Northeast is. States like New York are now losing popu- lation to Arkan- sas and Alabama, which were once considered eco- nomic backwa- ters.


Not only did


California lose 68,449 resi- dents to Florida, but those people also took some $12 billion in personal income with them between 2012 and 2022, the latest year for which we have numbers. California lost: 361,623 residents and $21


billion to Texas 74,978 residents and $4.5


Not only did California lose 68,449 residents to Florida, but those people also took some $12 billion in personal income with them.


MAMDANI


146,280 residents and $9.2 billion in income to Wash- ington state What do all four states


have in common? They have no personal income tax, while California has a punishingly progressive levy.


Someone making just


over $55,000 a year pays an 8% tax rate, while the top rate goes up to 13.3%. Only Hawaii, New York,


and New Jersey have top rates above 10%. Not surprisingly, those


four states are growing at 1% a year or less. New York alone has lost


2 million people from 2015 and 2024, with 80% of its cities and towns getting smaller.


Researchers


at Cornell Uni- versity in Ithaca, New York, pre- dict the state’s population could shrink by another 2 million over the next 25 years — a decline of more


than 13%. And that’s using economic models paid for by the government of New York!


There’s not much reason


for future optimism. New York City, which


makes up more than 40% of the Empire State’s popula- tion, is in the middle of an election for mayor. In June, the Democratic primary was won by Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old state legisla- tor who is a leading figure in Democratic Socialists of America.


Mamdani is on record


VAN/JASONRWARREN©ISTOCK / MAMDANI/AP IMAGES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100