Newsfront
U.S. Exposes Deadly Toxins in Food Supply
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. publishes list of chemicals and dyes that contribute to sickness epidemic.
T BY JERRY MCGLOTHLIN
he u.s. government is tak- ing action to expose deadly toxins in our food supply — putting the focus on a crisis
spotlighted in Newsmax magazine last December. The U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) launched an online database designed to consol- idate information about chemical lev- els in the food supply, exposing what many experts say is a major threat to the nation’s health from our diet of ultra-processed foods. Called the “Chemical Contami-
nants Transparency Tool,” and avail- able on the Food and Drug Adminis- tration website, it provides a search- able platform that allows consumers to see precisely what contaminants are in their diets. More than 10,000 chemicals, compounds, and dyes are currently allowed to be added to food sold in the U.S. From fresh produce to packaged
snacks, the tool compiles previously scattered data into an accessible for- mat, making it easier for Americans to make informed food choices.
NEW TRANSPARENCY The tool enables users to search by food category or contaminant type, revealing substances found in every- thing from peaches to pistachios. For consumers, it is a major break-
through, bringing government data out of dense regulatory documents
8 NEWSMAX | MAY 2025
and into the public eye. Health Secretary Robert F. Kenne-
dy Jr. emphasized the broader impli- cations of the initiative. “HHS is committed to radical trans-
parency to give Americans authentic, informed consent about what they are eating,” he said. “This new Chemical Contaminants Transparency Tool is a critical step for industry to Make America Healthy Again.”
HOW IT WORKS The database aggregates data from the FDA’s long-standing food monitoring programs, which routinely analyze food samples from both domestic and imported sources. These tests detect a range of con- taminants, including naturally occur- ring elements like arsenic and lead, as well as synthetic residues from pesti- cides and food processing.
We Are What We Eat T
he U.S. allows 10,000 harmful additives, compounds, and
dyes in our foods that are banned in most countries, Newsmax magazine revealed in its December cover story. With the nation suff ering an epidemic of chronic illness, many experts believe eating ultra-processed foods contributes to the frightening increase in cancers among younger people, as well as the wave of obesity that aff ects 74% of the population and shortens our lifespans, which are four years longer in comparable countries in Western Europe. Newsmax revealed U.S. food
producers have two sets of rules: one for foods sold to overseas customers and an entirely diff erent standard for foods made for consumption in this country.
Regulators categorize contaminant
levels based on safety thresholds estab- lished in federal guidelines. Some lev- els trigger enforcement action, while others serve as recommendations or legal tolerances.
TACKLING A LONG-STANDING PROBLEM In February, President Donald Trump signed an executive order establishing the Make America Healthy Commis- sion (MAHA), giving Kennedy author- ity to investigate the impact of toxic chemicals, food additives, and over- medication — issues that have been linked to rising chronic illnesses. Among the concerns addressed by
MAHA are artifi cial dyes, endocrine disruptors, and food additives that remain in circulation. These substances have been linked
to a range of health issues, from hyper- activity in children to long-term meta- bolic disorders.
INDUSTRY RESISTANCE One of the most concerning aspects of current food regulation is a government rule which allows companies to self- certify food additives. Kennedy has called for reform-
ing this policy, advocating for stricter review processes to prevent potentially harmful substances from entering the food supply. Kennedy is meeting with leading
food industry executives, urging them to voluntarily phase out synthetic dyes and additives associated with behav- ioral and developmental concerns in children. Not everyone in the food indus- try is welcoming the move. Some food producers worry that consumers may misinterpret the data, lead- ing to unwarranted fears.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100