search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COST


Making machine vision add up


Greg Blackman tries to put a figure on the cost of vision technology


H


ow much does machine vision cost? Tis is something that any engineer will have to specify when designing


an automation solution: there will be the cost of components, designing and building the system, and maintenance, with machine vision a percentage of that. But, does it actually matter what the


vision system costs? In some ways, what an integrator or equipment provider might quote for a vision system is not that important. What matters is return on investment,


which is the metric that any good automation or vision project should be based on. If adding a vision system to a manufacturing line improves productivity, or reduces waste or removes error, it will pay for itself over time. In pharmaceutical production, for


example, vision is such an important part of the manufacturing line it’s practically legislated, according to Simon Beveridge, managing director of UK-based vision integrator Siga Vision. Or, at least, the manufacturer has to have an operating


method that captures certain data, which is best achieved using vision. So, here, the cost of vision is largely irrelevant, because without it there’s no production line. (Read more about how Siga Vision has been working through the pandemic on page 26 ) Not all manufacturing requires vision


to the same extent as pharmaceutical production. Where it’s a little less clear cut on the necessity of vision technology, the starting point should be the application, and whether vision can be used to address the problem. David Dechow, principal vision


systems architect at US integrator Integro Technologies, explained that the difference


between a successful and unsuccessful vision installation comes down to technical knowledge and diligence in engineering. Also, making sure the system is specified correctly for the application; no one wants a system that doesn’t work. However it might be that the vision works, just not for the task for which it was built. ‘As an integrator, or even as a proponent


of vision technology, we want you to do it right first time,’ Dechow said, ‘and that requires some knowledge and diligence in engineering. It’s a function of engineering


Industrial Machine Vision Assemblies


Industrial Reliability. High Flex & Extended Length. Copper and Optical Solutions.


jossnat/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44