search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Hazardous materials


of a maximum of 2 cubic metres and a maximum detection tube length of 10m. These limitations implicit in the scope of LPS 1666 have prompted some UK interest in an alternative US standard, FM 5970.


low pressure (DLP/ILP) systems, even though the standard may not have been wholly suitable for systems using water, foam and chemical and inert firefighting gases. In respect of DLP/ILP systems in


heavy mobile plant, FM 5320 has been superseded by the issue of ANSI FM 5970: 2017: Heavy Duty Mobile Equipment Protection Schemes. To date, no UK manufacturer has yet achieved a listing to this standard. The question of certification and


The LPCB 166 Loss Prevention Standard Outside the UK, a design standard for


fire systems on mobile plant was issued by US insurance group FM Global, through its approvals service, as FM 5320: 2000. This standard only related to dry powder systems, but in the course of time, it was, de facto, adopted by some organisations as a generic standard for all direct/indirect


approvals is perhaps most important in connection with the protection of public service vehicles, as there is now an EU requirement (based on a UN mandate) for all buses and coaches used for the transport of more than 22 people. The Regulations, contained in UNECE R107 Revision 32


, require that all fire suppression


systems so used must comply with a specified test method, SP 49123


. So far,


only a limited number of UK suppliers have systems that comply with this test standard. There can be no doubt that LP modular


systems have substantial benefits for small area or object protection, and in areas where there are space limitations they may well become the system of choice. In particular, alternative energy production, including wind and solar power, may well provide a whole new market for these flexible systems


Stewart Kidd is a fire and security consultant and chartered security professional. For more information, view page 5


References 1. For a wholly independent and impartial view of the agents available, refer to BS 5306-0: 2011: Fire protection installations and equipment on premises. Guide for selection of installed systems and other fire equipment – note that this version of the standard does not consider modular systems. A review of the standard will take place in 2018 and the author will be pressing for reference to be made to modular systems.


2. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/ DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29regs/ R107r3e.pdf


3. http://www.sp.se/sv/units/risesafe/ safety/fire/Documents/Safebus/13795_ SP%20Metod%204912%20Släcksystem %20i%20motorrum_140919.pdf


www.frmjournal.com APRIL 2018 35


FOCUS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60