search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Engineered approach


sufficient compartmentation or refuge areas (for a case study on this subject, see page 26).


Fire service access


One further factor that needs to be considered for large or complex buildings is access by the fire services. Effective smoke control is vital to ensure that firefighters can easily progress through the building. For this reason, mechanical smoke ventilation systems will be recommended to provide a higher level of smoke clearance. Another issue when fighting a fire in a large building is access to water. Running the charged hoses through the building or across multiple storeys is often impractical. An effective solution to this issue is dry or wet risers – a system of pipework within the building to provide access to water. These are either filled with water (wet risers), or left dry for the fire service to connect the water supply. These are mandatory in buildings over 18m, with wet risers mandatory for buildings over 50m.


Testing a solution


Finally, an important part of any fire engineered solution is demonstrating how the proposed systems will work in practice. Techniques such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modelling allow the systems to be tested virtually to ensure they achieve the required level of safety.


Using CFD modelling, it is possible to


simulate the fluid dynamics (movement) of the smoke and fire within a digital model of the building over a set time period. This allows the physical behaviours, such as smoke rising, to be observed as it unfolds. It shows how the proposed layout and features of the building will affect the spread of the smoke, enabling the creation of an informed fire safety strategy and then evaluation of how it will work in practice. The computer model also highlights any


areas of concern, such as where smoke is hotter or denser, or where fire may spread more quickly. In addition to this, evacuation modelling and time equivalence modelling allow the simulation of an evacuation to demonstrate that the proposed layout allows the occupants to leave in a timely and safe manner.


A code compliant approach to fire strategy


is often restrictive or impractical, especially for buildings that are complex either by their design, intended use or inherent characteristics. However, engaging with experienced fire design consultants early in the process will allow a bespoke, engineered solution to be formulated and tested to meet both the required level of fire safety and the needs of the occupants


Steven Morgan is associate director of FDS Consult. For more information, view page 5


FOCUS


www.frmjournal.com OCTOBER 2018


27


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60