search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Figure 2: Goffart’s new silo


into practice that which M Goffart had demonstrated was practical in France’. As a direct result, ensilage became widespread in America, and the USDA issued a report confirming that the condition of stock fed on ensilage was healthy, they gained weight and the system was profitable. Farmers were also happy that the fodder was in a safe place, protected from storms and wet rot. In January 1882 a correspondent for the Guardian (London)


newspaper commented that there had been a succession of wet seasons1 which resulted in a very poor hay crop, and that American farmers had been experimenting with a system called ‘Ensilage’ to preserve green fodder. He quoted Rothamstead who had not been impressed because 40% of the dry organic matter of maize was lost in fermentation process, and actively discouraged farmers from pursuing the process. The correspondent finished with ‘Ensilage with its alcoholic tendencies2, can hardly hope to be raised to the dignity of a remedy for scant or defective fodder; at least in this country’. A month later, the Guardian reported that an Ensilage Congress had been held in New York, at which all the butter, milk and cheese at the lunch was made from silage-fed cattle. Samples of ensiled maize, clover, rye and various grasses were displayed. In October the same year, a Times correspondent explained a little of the history of the process: ‘At first in America the fodder was simply ‘clamped’3 in heaps 6ft high and 15ft long’. This correspondent writing from a farm in France noted that ‘more milk was given by the cows that ate ensilage than those which did not’; he also envisaged that ‘cubes of ensilage … may be eventually made into marketable blocks for dairy and other cattle’.


Figure 3: Clamped silage,


The Times, Oct 1882. With permission of Ancestry.com, copyright News UK.


In 1883 the Royal Agricultural Society of England decided to


investigate ensilage and the following year HM Jenkins published a substantial report into ‘Ensilage at Home and Abroad’. His report covered the history and detailed results of a survey comprising 23 questions to 40 UK farmers and six foreign correspondents (excluding America) concerning their experience with ensilage. There were silos below and above ground, square and round, roofed/unroofed, partly


Figure 5: Blunt’s Screw and Lever Ensilage Press


1. Particularly between 1878-1883 2. The Habitual Drunkards Act had been passed in 1879, and the Temperance movement was very active.


3. Is this the first reference to clamped silage? FEED COMPOUNDER SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2020 PAGE 35


chopped/chopped, detailed costings, feeding regimes, moisture readings, mechanical means of compression, examples of chaff and ensilage cutters. In 1885 the British Government appointed a Select Commission to investigate the potential of ensilage for British agriculture, the Ensilage Commission. They concluded that the system of storing undried green crops was a ‘valuable auxiliary to farm practice’. They also highlighted a difference in outlook between the scientific chemists who estimated the value of a foodstuff based on the analysis of the moisture, fat-forming, bone-forming and flesh-forming constituents compared to that of farmers who observed the effect of a foodstuff on the condition, rate of growth and development of livestock. They


Figure 4: FW Reynolds patent chain and screw compression silo


also noted that there was a general consensus from practical farmers that the results of feeding ensilage were of significant economic value compared to the ‘not very sanguine estimates formed … by scientific


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68