search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ORC A new experience (for all)


It’s been nearly 20 years since the IMS Worlds at New York YC in 2000 when an offshore world championship was held outside the Baltic or Mediterranean regions, so the excitement is building for this year’s worlds coming up in mid-July in The Hague. Already a strong turnout is indicated by the volume of entries


seen in Classes B and C, even though Class A is still a long way off the 50-entry per class limit; that said, at the time of writing a number of high-profile boats in the 46-52ft range have just begun requesting details of the event which is encouraging. Maybe it’s a slower burn for the bigger boats who know they are less likely to be squeezed out by entering later on. It’s been tempting to read into the combined use of both ORC and IRC ratings at the event being a popularity gauge for both


competition in their first two decades of use. A brief look over the entry lists also shows some returning world


and European ORC champions from northern Europe, yet sadly none has yet committed to come from the southern climes, not even any defending champions from last year’s worlds in Trieste. This may be an issue of timing – it would be a rush to get back in time to race in Copa del Rey, for example – but don’t underestimate how high cost can deter owners from committing to having big boats hauled across Europe. Transport cost should not be an inhibition for UK and France-


based teams to join in, however, and though some have signed up there are not as many as organisers expected; it could be that the IRC Europeans in the Solent, immediately before the worlds, are siphoning off available budgets of time and money for teams who are forced to choose only one major week-long event per season. But we’ll see, it’s not too late… especially in Class A where the


greater than usual offshore orientation of this year’s format (particularly with the likelihood of some fast sailing conditions in the North Sea) may hold more appeal to the bigger, faster boats. There have, however, been some serious enquiries from more


far-flung teams, such as Karl Kwok’s Pac 52 which has been competing on the US west coast under the direction of NZL-based Gavin Brady, and this would inject a strong dose of new design and sailing talent into Class A. There have also been some from the US who prefer not to thrash their way to Bermuda and are seriously considering a European tour. Regardless of the teams signed up already, there are many


extremely good racers and, after a week of seven inshore and two offshore races, this event will produce deserving world champions in each class. One possible deterrent for potential IRC-based entries is not


being familiar with the more complex ORC measurement and scoring protocols. Getting an ORCi certificate does demand more effort since the rating rule requires more data to be used to calculate a greater range of ratings than the single-number approach of IRC. While sail measurements are the same, freeboards and an


The Humphreys-designed Aquatich 40 ghosts along in the very light airs of last year’s ORC Worlds in the Adriatic. The boat only launched just before the 2017 event and will be better prepared this year – as well as happier in the breezier conditions of the North Sea. The new boat showed good pace last year on coastal stages but, with its all A-sail configuration, was nowhere near ready to take on the heavily optimised, conventionally rigged ORC-specific competition on windward-leeward inshore courses


systems, but this is probably not true: teams who decide to enter want the opportunity to compete against their peers in a well-run world championship sailing event, and the choice of handicap rules, while important, will not deter those who enjoy the sort of good, close racing these events have provided in the last several years where entry counts have exceeded 100 boats. Besides, a look across the boat types entered shows mostly


production designs that are raced in both systems and reflect the types of boats people like to sail at home. They are mostly fast, dual-purpose boats, such as the Italia 9.98 which has been winning in ORC championships when raced by top teams but is attractive simply because it is a modern, nicely designed boat available at a good price. Designer Matteo Polli says a larger cousin of the 9.98 is underway at Italia, but it is unlikely to be ready for The Hague. The Baltic-based, purpose-built custom designs from Cossutti


will be on hand, as will the Humphreys-designed Aquatich 40 (issue 456), campaigned by its owner from Norway. Neither has yet to find the podium in a major event, but maybe with good sailing and what’s anticipated to be a wider than usual range of conditions this will be the year. And there are also numerous older raceboat designs that have


held value in being competitive and fun to sail, such as several Farr 30s that have been released into handicap racing from class-based


30 SEAHORSE


inclination are also needed for the ORCi certificate, in addition to several more rig measurements and a declaration of crew weight; IRC crews may be more used to just hanging their yachts off a load cell on a hoist to obtain boat weight for the Endorsed IRC certificate required for bigger events such as this. But in truth these extra ORC measurements are not hard to


achieve for any boat with an IRC Endorsed certificate, and the IRC and ORC measurement teams have been collaborating on how and where to offer this service in areas where there is not an existing measurement infrastructure… a number of new ORC measurements have already been completed, with more scheduled. The lengthy pre-regatta measurement routine will also seem


onerous to those new to these championship-level events, but a necessary step to ensure the integrity of the regatta. And the protocol of having the top performers checked after each day’s racing will be taken seriously as well, with ORC rules allowing very slight tolerances but with prescribed penalties for non-compliance. The use of the ORC’s Triple Number ratings in the scoring scheme


will seem a further complexity to the IRC entries, yet too simple for the seasoned ORC teams used to Performance Curve Scoring (PCS)… but this compromise is necessary given the effect current is expected to have in the course areas used – where the PCS system can be vulnerable. Triple Number is actually simpler than it sounds, being a three-


tiered method that was pioneered in the Netherlands and is now widely used both there and elsewhere; think of it as three fixed IRC TCCs, one being applied for each of three broad wind-bands. In fact, don’t be surprised if some IRC sailors racing yachts that


sit away from the mainstream design parameters even come away favourably impressed by the benefits of a three-tier system that gives them a better chance of scoring more consistently across a varied week-long regatta. You never know!


q


ANDREA CARLONI


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110