FEATURE FOCUS: ALTERNATIVE PROVISION
measures are integrated, providing them with a platform where they can realise their full potential.
Small units and the funding dilemma Rising numbers of children with more complex needs, and a growing number of appeals in the SEND system, have led to challenges in high- needs funding. While small units offer undeniable benefits in terms of personalised attention and tailored support, their financial sustainability is becoming a concern.
Unlike mainstream schools that cater to hundreds, if not thousands, of students, AP units often consist of only 10 to 20 students. Many do not receive direct funding from the DfE and rely on daily rates paid directly by schools as their primary source of income. Yet, these units play a crucial role in providing the necessary support and guidance to a specific subset of students. However, the current economic landscape, influenced by high interest rates and inflation, threatens their continued existence. Their potential closure would create a significant void for students relying on the unique teaching methods and personalised care AP provides. Therefore, substantive policy changes are needed to address this and other previously identified problems. Investing in the sustainability and growth of these units should be a priority to retain their positive impact. One option is exploring cost-effective technology solutions that can enhance educational delivery and administrative efficiency, potentially saving on operational costs.
Regional disparities in access to AP Another challenge plaguing the UK’s AP landscape is the regional discrepancies in its availability – often driven by variations in economic conditions, infrastructure, and the availability of specialised resources in different regions.
For instance, students living in urban areas like London may have easier access to AP facilities, while those residing in rural regions, such as Lincolnshire, might need to overcome considerable geographic barriers. The absence of nearby AP units could discourage students from pursuing academia, leaving them disadvantaged due to limited educational opportunities, perpetuating the cycle of inequality. Bridging the regional gap in access to AP requires targeted efforts, including increased funding, improved infrastructure, and the development of comprehensive support services, to ensure that all children have equitable access to quality education.
Efforts should be made to establish AP units in underserved areas, ensuring students in remote regions have the same opportunities as their urban counterparts. Collaborative partnerships between organisations, local authorities, and schools can create a support network and AP options throughout the country.
Debunking the misconception One damaging misconception associated with AP is the perception that it is exclusively designed for “naughty kids”. While other approaches can indeed benefit troubled learners with diverse learning styles and needs, they are not limited to those facing behavioural challenges. This inaccurate portrayal undermines the various
January 2024
reasons behind the demand for AP. In truth, AP provides support and education to students who have been excluded from school, are at risk of exclusion, or require a different form of education for various reasons. This includes students with social, emotional, and mental health needs.
A compelling case study emerged from Milton Keynes*, highlighting the positive impact of AP on a student. This student, who struggled with anxiety in mainstream education, found solace in a Pupil Referral Unit (PRU). The PRU’s experienced staff members, well-versed in supporting students with special educational needs and disability (SEND) and mental health difficulties, guided and taught the student effectively.
Today, this same student is excelling at the University of Cambridge, studying history and politics. The individual’s achievements were made possible due to the exceptional care and personalised approach at the AP unit. It is essential to understand the uniqueness of the AP sector and how AP schools and providers operate. AP schools and providers frequently assume distinct functions and roles within local education ecosystems. While some concentrate on long-term placements, others specialise in short-term arrangements designed to facilitate students’ return to mainstream education. Additionally, certain providers extend outreach services to mainstream schools to help pupils remain in school. Most AP settings perform a
blend of these functions and tailor their provisions to address the evolving needs in their respective areas.
For example, we primarily work with local authorities and their virtual school teams, as well as schools that refer children under their care to us. We supply these institutions with detailed information and progress reports, allowing them to closely monitor the development and attendance of their students.
Addressing the challenges within AP requires collaborative efforts from educational authorities, policymakers, and funding bodies. Providing expedited access to AP can transform students’ educational journeys, ensuring they have timely support when they need it most. Additionally, it is crucial to deflate misconceptions surrounding AP, emphasising that it caters to a wide range of students with unique needs rather than solely focusing on behavioural issues.
By working together, it is possible to create a more inclusive and accessible education system that caters to the diverse needs of all students. Let us foster an environment where AP thrives, providing a pathway to success for all students across the UK.
•
https://www.miltonkeynes.co.uk/news/ people/student-who-spent-years-at-pupil- referral-unit-in-milton-keynes-gets-in-to- cambridge-university-4375157
www.education-today.co.uk 39
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
