search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
VIEWS & OPINION


Cost-effective school improvement is achievable Comment by MATT TIPLIN, VP of ONVU Learning, former senior leader in a MAT School and an Ofsted inspector


Funding for schools is not going up as fast as the costs pressures they face. And now that schools are expected to receive less money than originally thought, difficult decisions loom around the scale and pace of school improvement. But putting the brakes on school improvement plans could have a


significant negative impact on pupil progress. As schools juggle balancing the books with delivering good quality education, what steps can they take to support teachers and ensure school improvement remains an achievable target?


A shared approach


One way is to foster a culture of collaboration. This can have a huge impact on school performance, without eating into the budget.


But as schools are busy places, teachers can often miss out on conversations with colleagues that can help them talk through any problems they might be experiencing in the classroom.


As it’s not easy for teachers to find the time to have informal chats, setting aside dedicated times for staff to share their professional experiences and personal reflections can help them to feel more supported and less isolated. Research shows that encouraging greater collaboration improves the quality of teaching practice. When time is short they want to know what approach has worked for their colleagues and how the suggested improvements could be effectively and practically implemented.


For example, grouping teachers with similar training needs together in a session can encourage them to share issues and talk through practical solutions. It removes the ‘judgement’ and instead promotes and environment where everyone learns from one another, helping teachers to feel more valued and trusted.


But precisely because time is short, it can tempt schools to limit CPD to whole school INSET days, which typically focus too much on whole school priorities and not enough on the needs of individual teachers. This can leave teachers feeling less engaged in the training offered and frustrated that their time is being taken up when they it would be better spent preparing lesson plans.


Rather than hiring a trainer to provide training from a podium or sending teachers for expensive off-site CPD, consider making it easier to for staff to collaborate and learn from one another instead. It’s a strategy that can help schools cut costs while continuing to improve outcomes for children.


January 2024 Teacher retention is key


Recruiting new teachers and training them up is expensive for schools and difficult to achieve given the current recruitment challenges, but there are also chronic teacher retention issues. For pupils to flourish their teachers need to flourish, but


if we are to go by the results of education charity Education Support’s seventh Teacher Wellbeing Index then the sector could be in trouble.


Loneliness, isolation, stress, and burnout are all cited as contributing to a significant decline in the overall wellbeing of classroom teachers and senior leaders.


Ian Hartwright, head of policy at school leaders’ union NAHT has expressed concern about the current crisis in retention of teachers and school leaders. Providing teaching cover for staff off sick is both costly and a potential disrupter to pupils learning and can have a negative impact on both the performance and bottom line of the school. Although not a magic bullet, ongoing, good quality and relevant CPD taking place regularly within a collaborative environment can drive cost effective school improvement and better support teachers to stay in their role.


Put teachers at the centre of the own professional development


According to a report by the Schools Improvement Commission, ‘school improvement should not be a top- down, one-size-fits-all process; schools need to own their improvement and not have it dictated to them.’ Putting teachers at the front and centre of the own professional development gives them the autonomy to decide the areas for development themselves. These can be identified through reflective practice, for example by videoing and reviewing their own lessons using camera technology, that way they can see for themselves what worked and what perhaps didn’t, giving them more ownership over areas they want to improve.


It’s also worthwhile encouraging teachers to share any lessons learnt with colleagues or suggesting a colleague review the footage as a peer-on-peer review can provide valuable insight into how the lesson went. Especially so if the observer has first-hand experience of teaching this set of pupils and can offer practical suggestions to improve teaching practice. Sharing the lesson footage can help the observer too, as they could also pick up new ideas and approaches to develop their own teaching practice. Doubling the value. It is far more cost effective and efficient to retain teachers in the longer term by shaping school improvement plans around what’s happening in their classroom. This approach places explicit trust in teachers’ individual skills which could drive school improvement and support growth.


In the words of Sir Tim Brighouse, “School improvement is how schools create an ever-better climate for the individual and groups of teachers to do their job in the most favourable circumstances.”


It doesn’t have to be costly.


www.education-today.co.uk 29


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68