search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UK LEGAL


Strong Appeal Q:


What do Gary Neville, Anthony Joshua and the Easter Bunny have in common?


A: They’ve all been banned for use in gambling adverts in the UK, due to being of strong appeal to under 18s.


The ‘strong appeal’ rules by the ASA states that adverts for gambling must not “be of strong appeal to children or young persons, especially by reflecting or being associated with youth culture” (CAP Code 16.3.12 and BCAP Code 17.4.5) and replaced previous wording that adverts must not be of “particular appeal” to under-18s. However, despite three years of rulings by the ASA on this topic, the question of whether an advert is likely to have strong appeal to under 18s remains challenging to predict.


SPORTS PERSONALITIES In some early rulings on this point, the ASA determined that current top level football players were of inherently strong appeal. In late 2022, a complaint about the use of Premier League footballers Philippe Coutinho, Jesse Lingard and Kalidou Koulibaly in an advert for


22 SEPTEMBER 2025


Since the introduction of the ‘strong appeal’ rules by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in October 2022, a series of rulings have clarified which personalities and characters can and cannot appear in gambling adverts. Northridge Law’s Melanie Ellis kicks off this month’s column with with a pub quiz…


Ladbrokes was upheld. This was followed by a ruling against Bet Victor in April 2023, in relation to a Facebook advert featuring FC Barcelona players Jordi Alba and Sergio Busquets, which confirmed that footballers did not need to play in the UK’s Premier League to be of strong appeal to under 18s.


Sports other than football have not escaped the notice of the advertising regulator. In August 2023, Ladbrokes was pulled up again, this time for featuring top tennis players Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal, Nick Kyrgios and Stefanos Tsitsipas in various tweets. In November that year, a complaint was upheld against Betfred for tweets featuring the boxer Anthony Joshua.


The position is slightly less clear when it comes to retired sports personalities. Peter Crouch was featured in TV ads for Paddy Power in November 2022 leading to two complaints, but the ASA noted that Crouch had not paid professionally since 2019 and did not have active accounts on social media. He had recently appeared on the TV show the Masked Dancer which was popular with children but also had broad appeal, with the ASA ultimately


concluding that the Paddy Power adverts were unlikely to be of strong appeal to under 18s. Former cricketer Stuart Broad was also deeded acceptable for use in a post on X by Fitzdares, likewise retired footballer Micah Richards in a promoted tweet for Sky Bet. However, retired footballer Gary Neville was considered to be of strong appeal to under 18s in another Sky Bet promoted tweet. The total count of under 18s social media followers is a key factor when distinguishing between these retired sportspeople. Gary Neville is notable for having a large following on X and Instagram, with over 7 million followers across those platforms at the date of the ASA ruling in October 2023. 1% of his X followers and 5% of his Instagram followers were under 18, which although a small percentage added up to at least 135,000 under 18 followers in total. In contrast, Micah Richards and Peter Crouch did not have significant presence on social media while Stuart Broad had a total following across the various platforms of over 2 million, but this included only around 7,500 followers who were under 18.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108