search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Data Storage


Recovery planning stays with the customer, not the platform Resilient infrastructure and a tested recovery plan are not the same thing. Microsoſt’s shared responsibility guidance for Azure reliability states clearly that while the platform provides infrastructure availability, configuring and testing a disaster recovery strategy matched to specific business objectives remains the customer’s responsibility. Recovery failures rarely stem from a complete platform outage.


More oſten they come from failover processes that have never been tested at the right scale; recovery environments that are geographically remote from operations; or restored services that no longer reflect the production state the business depends on. Migrating a workload without revisiting the recovery design carries those risks forward. We speak to businesses regularly that assumed their cloud


provider’s resilience model covered their recovery needs. What they find when they test, or when they need to invoke a plan, is that the recovery environment is in a different region, latency is higher than expected, and the restored service does not perform as the business requires. Continuity planning has to start with what the business actually needs, then work back to where workloads should sit.


Placing workloads according to what they require Hybrid infrastructure has come back into focus because most


estates contain workloads with genuinely different requirements. A front-end service with unpredictable traffic spikes suits the elasticity of public cloud. A latency-sensitive application or AI inference workload may need to sit closer to users, because routing requests to a distant cloud region adds delay that real- time processing cannot absorb. A recovery environment needs to be geographically separated from production while remaining operationally reachable. Regulated data may need to be held in a jurisdiction that can be clearly evidenced to auditors. Treating all as equivalent, and placing them in the same environment by default, is where performance problems and recovery gaps accumulate. Pulsant operates 14 UK data centres across a UK national


footprint, giving businesses genuine flexibility over where workloads and recovery environments sit. For organisations with data residency requirements, a UK colocation model makes jurisdiction easier to demonstrate than infrastructure spread across hyperscale regions. Edge Fabric provides private, high- bandwidth, low-latency connectivity between sites and clouds, keeping a distributed model operationally coherent. Te public cloud plays a legitimate role in most enterprise


infrastructure strategies. Te more useful question is which workloads belong there, and which need a private environment with tighter controls over data placement, performance, and recovery.


The hidden Opportunity ___In


Digital transformation creates better experiences for students, staff and administrators.


education


PEOPLE


Students, teachers, parents and communities.


ENROLMENTS


Applications, Registrations and the student journey.


SCANNERS


Capture and transform the documents into digital workflows.


INFORMATION


Records, assessments, communications and decisions.


Connecting people, technology and to support better education.


SCHOOLS / COLLEGES / UNIVERSITIES


Digital transformation starts with better experiences.


www.pcr-online.biz


September/October 2026 | 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52