search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Column: Silicon systems design


System-level verifi cation in the chiplet era


By Mike Bartley, CEO, Alpinum C


hiplet-based architectures are rapidly becoming a dominant approach for scaling performance, flexibility and cost efficiency in advanced


silicon systems. By decomposing large monolithic designs into smaller, reusable dies, engineers can mix process nodes, integrate heterogeneous IP and accelerate innovation across compute, memory and specialised accelerators. As chiplet adoption matures, however,


a critical challenge is becoming increasingly visible. Verification


complexity no longer resides primarily at the IP or die level. Instead, it emerges at the system level, where independently verified components interact in ways that are difficult to predict, observe and validate using traditional approaches. This shift has significant implications


for how verification is planned, executed and signed off. In chiplet- based systems, correct IP does not automatically result in correct silicon. Understanding why requires a closer examination of how integration complexity manifests in modern multi- die designs.


From IP verification to system behaviour For decades, verification practice has been organised around a clear hierarchy. Individual IP blocks are validated in isolation and then integrated at the SoC level, where additional checks focus on connectivity, coherence and top-level functionality. Once expected behaviours are demonstrated and regressions stabilise, designs progress toward tape-out. Chiplet-based systems challenge


this model. Each die may be developed by a different team, sourced from a different vendor, or optimised for a different process technology. While each component can be functionally correct within its own verification environment, system behaviour emerges only when these components interact. As the verification scope expands from


individual blocks to composed systems, assumptions that hold at the IP and SoC levels increasingly break down under system-level interaction.


Figure 1: Evolution of verifi cation scope from block-level validation to system-level behaviour as designs transition from monolithic SoCs to chiplet-based systems


12 February 2026 www.electronicsworld.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48