search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SURVEY REVEALS THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL TWIN TECHNOLOGY


One of the biggest developments in the world of technology over the last few years has been that of digital twins. A digital twin is a virtual replica of a physical system, process or product. The technology essentially provides a real-time look at how a physical asset is performing. Digital marketing specialists Reboot Online has analysed the latest findings from research facilities provider ‘Catapult’, who surveyed engineers (from a range of disciplines) to better understand the components they believe are the most necessary for digital twin technology to function effectively. Reboot Online found that a


‘physical asset’ (71%) is the component that engineers think is the most necessary for a digital twin. Thereafter, 52% of the


experts view a ‘live data set’ as an essential feature for the functionality of digital twins. 45% also believe an ‘offline data set’ is a very important component for the technology. Interestingly, with a digital twin


being a pairing of the virtual and physical worlds, just 45% of engineers rate ‘3D representation’ as a must have variable for the technology. On a similar note, 31% state ‘2D graphic representation’ is needed for a digital twin to work properly. Only 39% place ‘trend analysis


of historical data’ as a vital attribute for a digital twin. Even less feel ‘prediction of future events’ (32%) is a critical aspect that can push the technology to achieve desired objectives. Furthermore, Reboot Online also


wanted to identify the stages in the product life cycle that can gain the most value from integrating and using digital twins. Reboot Online discovered that


‘maintenance, repair and operations’ (77%) is the stage in the product life cycle where the majority of engineers believe digital twin technology adds the greatest value. Thereafter, engineers view ‘manufacturing’ (70%) as the next most likely process to benefit from the utilisation of digital twin technology. Naomi Aharony is managing


director at Reboot Online. Follow this link to see her view/opinion on digital twin technology: https://www.youtube.com/


watch?v=m2oXuFpv0uc www.rebootonline.com


Want to keep up to date? Then follow us on Twitter: @CI_process and/or ‘Like’ us on Facebook!


There’s no getting away from it, the topic of Industry 4.0 looks set to dominate developments in the process industry again this year, as more and more processors begin to reap its rewards. With this in mind, this month’s issue of Process & Control includes a number of features with an Industry 4.0 theme. For example, Martin Walder from


Schneider Electric looks at the growing importance of Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0 solutions, and discusses the many advantages it offers (p.13) Simon Kempa, from Senseye,


shows how the combination of Industry 4.0, advanced analytics and machine leaning tools will deliver effective predictive maintenance in manufacturing (p.14). And Paul Streatfield, from Bosch Rexroth, explains why sensors are a sensible starting point for Industry 4.0 projects (p17). So, if you’re currently considering


digitising your process, read on... Michelle Lea


Editor SERVICE CONTRACTS HELP OPTIMISE STEAM SYSTEMS


Iain Harper, service sales manager UK and Ireland at Spirax Sarco, offers advice to plant managers who want to make sure their steam system operates at peak efficency: The most cost-effective way for


plant managers to keep their steam system operating at its full potential, is to outsource some, or all, of the maintenance work. A service contract is a flexible way to make sure that a plant maintains peak operational efficiency, ensures equipment longevity and gives the customer peace of mind that all their equipment is safely maintained by dedicated engineers. Whether old equipment has been


replaced, or a completely new system has been installed, having a service contract in place offers the freedom to choose a level of support to match plant needs and budget. Those who opt for a service contract with Spirax Sarco will never have to commit to an agreement that provides services which don’t apply to them, as customers provide


the details of what they want included in their own, bespoke agreement. Therefore, if regular cleaning of the plate heat exchanger is needed without 24-hour priority response cover, plant managers can choose (and pay for) what they need, and nothing more. Things don’t always go to plan in


the plant room or boilerhouse, but unplanned issues certainly needn’t be a disaster. A service contract gives those who manage the steam plant priority over those without a contract, ensuring that they receive support when they need it. sxscom.uk/ServiceContracts


Emerson has received what is said to be industry’s first ISASecure System Security Assurance (SSA) Level 1 certification for cybersecurity. This certification, for Emerson’s newest DeltaV distributed control system, is the latest step in it’s commitment to provide secure digital transformation solutions for customers. The certification, issued by industry consortium ISA Security Compliance Institute (ISCI), independently certifies that Emerson’s DeltaV distributed control and safety systems are robust against network and system attacks. The ISA cybersecurity certification is designed to help the industry navigate the ever-changing digital landscape and recognise products with enhanced cybersecurity measures. ISASecure SSA Level 1 certification covers the most critical standards of the automation industry’s leading family of standards, ANSI/ISA 62443 (IEC 62443). Andre Ristaino, managing director


of ISCI, said: “Emerson is taking a leading role that we hope other vendors will follow...”


www.Emerson.com/cybersecurity          


4 MARCH 2019 | PROCESS & CONTROL





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52