Finance in helping navigate the economic ‘new normal’” conservatively estimates that over the next five years $567 billion in investment funds are needed for digital transformation alone in the global food and beverage industry4

. Nonetheless, the

incremental increase in annual revenue that manufacturers can stand to gain from digitalising their processes is significant. Research from Siemens Financial Services (SFS) has shown that manufacturers can stand to gain an additional 6.3 – 9.8% of their annual revenues from bringing digitalisation into their manufacturing operations5 Even as the crisis recedes, food and


beverage companies will need to integrate business agility into their operations if they are to cope with continued uncertainty. Sensor technology and machine learning are already being used by the brewing industry to predict when beer moves from fermentation to the free rise phase – effectively “teaching” technology to predict when it is ready for the next stage of production6

. Similarly, artificial

intelligence (AI) has been employed to identify hazards in milk or detect machinery faults before they occur7

. All of these

applications help to minimise downtime, prevent spoilt batches and increase the operational efficiency of the production line. Aware of the enhanced operating agility

and efficiency that digitalisation offers, 74% of SMEs in the industry have already made steps towards improving production processes through digital technologies8

however, investment appetite tends to shrink as companies feel a need to focus on shorter-term returns. That being said, commentators9

Brian Foster, head of Industry Finance at Siemens Financial Services, UK, says investing in agile digital technologies is key to a resilient food and beverage industry


he economic impact of the current pandemic is expected to be significant and prolonged. Last year, the food and

beverage industry has had to rapidly adapt to changing circumstances and patterns of consumption – be it suppressed or increased demand. The industry will be reshaped in the medium- to long-term and companies that are unable to adapt quick enough to the ‘new normal’ will run the risk of getting left behind. Unsurprisingly then, companies who had

invested in agile technologies and machinery were best placed to react to shifting market demands with optimal flexibility when the crisis hit. Companies with automated and

digitalised production units were less affected by the lockdown-induced staff shortages1

, for

instance, making them more resilient. Surviving recent disruptions required business agility on all fronts – companies that weren’t sufficiently equipped for a drop in demand were faced with a lack of cold storage for perishables2

, for example. Conversely,

manufacturers equipped with ‘digital twins’ were able to simulate coronavirus impact scenarios and react quickly and effectively in volatile situations3

. The challenges inhibiting investment,

however, are considerable. Our latest report “Rising to the new challenge: the role of Smart


continue to invest typically emerge ahead of their competitors. This means that the pandemic and its economic aftermath have in fact made the importance of investing in new technology more important – not less. In fact, the urgent challenges of the

pandemic and its long-term effects may even compress the timeline for investing into a shorter period. Previous research from SFS estimated the window of opportunity left to gain competitive advantage from investing in digitalisation to be 5-7 years away10

. After this

point, manufacturers having not invested may struggle to ever catch-up. It is likely that this estimation may need to be narrowed to account for the impact of the crisis. To provide food and beverage

manufacturers – large and small – with a financially sustainable path through the current challenging environment, smart financing models are emerging. Smart finance for digital transformation in manufacturing tends to come from integrated specialist financiers, where the

. In times of crisis,

suggest that companies who

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74