BSEE


Roy Jones, technical director at Gilberts Blackpool, reviews the latest changes to tesng and standards for smoke control dampers to deliver safer soluons in smoke control.


rapidly keep abreast of both updated and new guidance. The essence is that, going forward, smoke control systems must be designed, installed and maintained, and be treated as part of a holistic, on-going process, not a ‘fit and forget’.


F


Dame Judith Hackitt’s “Building a Safer Future: independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety” is the major driver behind revised guidance for the UK. Alongside that are revisions to Building Regulations Approved Document B: Fire Safety - Volumes 1 and 2 : 2019 (affecting England & Wales), published as recently as May 2020, along with the Scotland Building Regulations Technical Handbook Part 2 updated in 2019 and the CIBSE Guide E Fire Safety Engineering (4th edition 2019).


To cater for the lifetime of the building, the “golden thread” of balancing objectives and performance must be understood. The objective needs to be in place throughout, from design to implementation and the ongoing building operational, management and maintenance functions. This will ensure not only compliance with all the new changes, but the confidence that best practice has been used at all levels, thereby ensuring that the building will be safe throughout its intended use.


ire safety and security within occupied structures is seeing massive flux, with building services providers having to


Controlling smoke


Whenever there is a fire in any occupied building, whether residential or commercial, one of the most significant risks for the occupants is smoke inhalation. It is therefore crucial that a robust system exists to contain the smoke and then extract it via an uninterrupted path, away from those occupants to outside of the building. To develop the most effective deployment of dampers for smoke control in ventilation systems, as mentioned above, it is important to consider risks holistically, to develop and consider the array of “cause and effect” as early as possible in the design process. For operational success, the specification should be critically assessed, so that the systems maintain appropriate simplicity. This ensures that they not only protect life and property, but also reduce the responsibility on firefighter operation with numerous override controls.


On high rise buildings a stairwell or service shaft is commonly used as the smoke stack or “protected shaft”. Smoke dampers are employed and strategically positioned to preserve the integrity of these and all corridors and lobbies within the building. This strategy ensures that correct


compartmentation is maintained during any such fire event. According to the relevant guidance BS EN 1366-10:2011 Smoke and heat control systems – Smoke control dampers: ‘smoke control


SECURITY & SAFETY Smoke ventilation for safer built environments


dampers at the fire and along the path have to be open and remain open. Smoke control dampers at branches, or on the surface of the duct, along the path need to be closed and remain closed”. In simple terms this means that, if a fire starts on a floor, that damper should be open (or move to the open position if closed) to evacuate the smoke into the smoke shaft. On all other floors the dampers remain closed (or move to the closed position if open) to protect these floors from the fire and smoke now moving up the shaft to the evacuation point, usually on the roof of the building.


The smoke/ fire detection system needs to be sited to activate the protective system/smoke dampers and limit the spread of fire and smoke as early as possible. Early warning will allow almost immediate activation of the smoke control system and ensure it operates as designed.


A typical smoke control system with automatic (motorised) activation requires a damper that operates automatically on signal such as a fire alarm, without any manual action/intervention. In this application, once initiated, the system will not allow the damper position to be changed by external input or firefighter’s override with this design.


Less common are smoke control systems that allow manual intervention to be put into operation, leading to a sequence of actions in the operation of the smoke control system.


Such systems will allow the smoke control damper position to be changed by external


input/firefighter’s override. The system design must allow for this intervention and products utilised must conform to the standard that allows them to be operated during the fire event. Dampers especially must be even more carefully selected for this adjustment in a dynamic system and checked to confirm that the data provided by the manufacturer allows for such a damper to be adjusted during the fire event.


The importance of certification


To ensure the validity of any smoke evacuation damper, ensure it is CE marked to BS EN 12101-8:2011 smoke and heat control systems. This also involves the product being tested to BS EN 1366-10 fire resistance tests for service installations and classified to BS EN 13501-4:2016 fire classification of construction products and building elements. Dampers must meet these standards and thus the specific criteria within them need to be met.


By law, manufacturers must provide a DOP (declaration of performance), which must include the required criteria for each application to clearly detail the level of test for which the damper can be utilised. It is essential to check this, as not all dampers are rated and tested to the same level of the standard. The simplest and clearest current detail is provided in the SCA (Smoke Control Association) guidance document “Guidance on Smoke Control to Common Escape Routes in Apartment Buildings (Flats and Maisonettes)”. This confirms the required level of damper testing for application.


Maintenance matters


A further consideration during selection of a system of smoke evacuation, is that if dampers are chosen to be employed, these will need to be regularly tested to ensure they remain operational. Maintenance of the system and the damper itself should be regularly checked to prove this. This will ensure the life safety system that has been put in place will operate as designed when called upon should a fire event occur. Manufacturers will advise a period for general testing but it is incumbent upon the designer to set the smallest time frame for repeat testing to keep the building system maintained to its required level. To this end with whole life building use in mind, the designer should look at the most effective system with a focus on quality, simplicity, ease of use and maintenance, not just for dampers but for all systems and components. Smoke protection is, like many other areas of building services, a specialised area. It is therefore helpful to design and develop the system in partnership with


established proven professionals and manufacturers. Such a partnership ensures all the bases are covered, checked and validated, and a cohesive, compliant solution is delivered.


36 BUILDING SERVICES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER OCTOBER 2020 Read the latest at: www.bsee.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50