search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Monitoring & metering R


esearchers at the University of Sheffield are exploring new exhaust aftertreatment systems for heavy-duty engines capable of running on clean, zero-carbon fuels. This 4-year project is funded by an EPSRC grant and supported by the industrial partner Eminox. The project is led by Bill Nimmo, Professor of Energy Engineering and Sustainability, with PhD student Madhumitha Rajendran.


BACKGROUND


The decarbonisation of transport represents a vitally important component of global initiatives to minimise the impacts of climate change. However, whilst the elec- trification of light vehicles is a logical way forward, heavy vehicles used in the rail, marine and construction sectors have high torque requirements that are unsuited to electric power. In addition, diesel engines burn fossil fuels releasing carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas (GHG), as well as other pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides (NOx). Some oxides of nitrogen are not GHGs but they do perform a role in the formation of tropospheric ozone which is


a GHG. Nitrous oxide (N2O) however, is produced by combustion processes, and is a potent GHG. Alternative solutions are necessary across the entire transport sector, hence the drive toward clean fuel engine development, alongside new exhaust treat- ment technologies.


NEW EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEMS FOR HEAVY-DUTY ENGINES


The research focuses on ammonia as a clean fuel. The first stage involves modeling dual fuel combustion and emission characteristics of ammonia with a carbon- based promoter. Ammonia requires a combustion promoter because of its higher absolute minimum ignition energy than traditional fuels. The second stage of the work will evaluate the NOx reduction efficiencies of commercial catalysts for the ammonia-based dual fuel, utilising a suite of Signal Group gas analysers donated to the project by Eminox.


WHY AMMONIA?


Ammonia is considered a clean fuel because its (complete) combustion products are nitrogen and water. However, NOx gases are a byproduct of ammonia combustion. Nevertheless, ammonia represents a rela- tively good energy source and global infrastructure for its production and transportation already exists because of ammonia’s role in agricultural fertilizers. There are several types of ammonia, each attrib- uted a colour according to its production method. Traditional ammonia is known as ‘grey’ because it uses natural gas, but if carbon capture is used to remove carbon dioxide emissions, the ammonia is labelled ‘blue’. ‘Green’ ammonia is made using green hydrogen, created by electrolysis from renewable energy, so no fossil fuels are required.


In contrast with hydrogen, ammonia does not require cryogenic conditions for transportation as a liquid. Also, ammonia can be produced from hydrogen, and ammonia can be ‘cracked’ back to hydrogen after


62


DEVELOPING CATALYSTS FOR A CLEAN FUEL FUTURE


the catalysts. This instrumentation includes a heated vacuum chemiluminescence gas analyser for the


measurement of NOx, NO and NO2. A flame ionisa- tion detector to analyse hydrocarbon levels, and a non-dispersive infrared multi-gas analyser for contin- uous measurements of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. This instrument is also fitted with an oxygen sensor.


INITIAL RESULTS


So far, modelling work has indicated that the use of an ammonia dual fuel could increase


transportation, which means that ammonia can help resolve the transport issues associated with hydrogen. Ammonia presents a number of challenges as a fuel for engine combustion. In addition to the requirement for a promoter fuel, these include NOx in the exhaust as well as ammonia slip, which is important because ammonia is both corrosive and toxic, and because unburned fuel represents inefficiency.


RESEARCH PHASE 1 – DUAL FUEL COMBUS- TION MODELLING


Initial work is being undertaken with ‘Ansys Chem- kin-Pro’ a chemical kinetics simulator program that models idealised reacting flows and provides insight into results. Madhumitha has been using the modelling program to investigate predicted effects on engine efficiency and emissions profile, by adjusting a number of different variables, such as stoichiometry, fuel energy shares, and fuel injection parameters. The results of the modelling are being used to inform subsequent work.


RESEARCH PHASE 2 – POST-COMBUSTION TREATMENT


The second phase of the research, which is due to commence at the end of 2024, will evaluate the NOx reduction efficiencies of commercially available selective catalytic reduction (SCR) materials under a range of different conditions. Three different SCR catalysts will be trialled, based on zeolite, vanadium oxide and titanium. The research laboratory in Sheffield contains a controlled temperature furnace reactor using simu- lated exhaust gases. Catalyst studies will be performed at Sheffield while partners at Brunel University in London will be conducting similar work with a diesel engine test bed; primarily to investigate combustion and fuel injection issues relating to ammonia fuel, but also to help verify exhaust gas composition under a range of conditions. Combined with the kinetic simulation work at Sheffield, realistic exhaust gas composition will be fed to the experimental reactor.


GAS ANALYSIS


The post catalyst exhaust gases will be analysed by the Signal Group analyser rack, after treatment by


N2O emissions under certain operating conditions, particularly in cold starts. Exhaust gas temperature will reduce, while moisture and hydrogen levels can be expected to increase, and the effects of this on SCR catalyst deNOx efficiency will be studied further. The model also showed that the utilisation of ammonia dual fuel has a number of implications for prospective SCR catalysts. For example, ammonia in the exhaust can help reduce NOx, and both hydrogen and hydrocarbons in the exhaust can enhance NOx


conversion at moderate temperatures. However, N2O will be difficult to decompose at low temperatures. By identifying regimes of operation and emissions, recom- mendations can be made on catalyst specification and operating conditions to mitigate any operational issues.


SUMMARY


The development of clean fuel technology will be critically important to the decarbonisation of heavy vehicles. For example, the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) has a GHG emissions reduction strategy to reach net-zero by 2050, including a 20 per cent reduction by 2030 and a 70 per cent reduction by 2040, compared to 2008 levels. To reach these ambi- tions, the IMO will implement regulatory measures to be adopted in 2025 and enter into force around mid-2027. The achievement of these decarbonisation goals will depend heavily on the use of carbon-neutral fuels. This, in turn, means that new engine technology will be necessary, operating efficiently under known stoichiometric conditions, combined with effective aftertreatment systems to ensure the release of non-toxic, climate-friendly emissions. Madhumitha explains, “The challenge for the project is to consider the minimisation of all potentially harmful emissions from new fuels, and we will be


keeping a close eye on any N2O, NOx and ammonia when developing the new SCR systems. However, the successful achievement of our goals will play an impor- tant role in helping the heavy vehicle sector to reduce its GHG emissions, so we are hugely excited about the prospects for this important project.”


Signal Group www.signal-group.com November 2024 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96