search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Cases & enclosures


BUILDING DESIGN AND INSTALLATION:


ENSURING FIRE SAFETY FOR ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS


I 20


To protect electrical junctions in buildings from the threat of fire, embedding connections in concrete has been one of the possible solutions in the past, depending on the building design. While concrete is fire resistant, the challenges of access make inspection, as well as installation, more complex to achieve. Instead, fire-protected enclosures mounted directly onto a wall surface can make maintenance and installation significantly faster while maintaining the required safety standards. Chris Lloyd, managing director at Spelsberg UK, explains the advantages of fire-resistant, surface-mounted enclosures.


n the event of a building fire, safety systems must continue operating for a prolonged period. As well as alarms to warn occupants and alert emergency services, lighting must remain active to highlight a safe exit route. Smoke and heat extraction systems might be relied on, as well as water booster systems to supply extinguishers, while dedicated eleva- tors might need to safely transport fire crews. All these systems need electrical power and protec- tion of their supply during a blaze, potentially for an hour or more after a fire has taken hold. To achieve this, cable junctions and distribution boards have histori- cally been designed and embedded within concrete protection. However, installing electrical connections within fire-protected enclosures mounted directly onto walls can offer equivalent protection – and in some cases can provide greater security.


THE CONCRETE CHALLENGE While concrete is fire-resistant, the protection it provides to embedded electrical junctions depends on its thickness, and whether additional insulating materials are used in combination. Moreover, embedded electrical junctions might not sufficiently contain a fire should an electrical failure occur inside a concrete wall. In a case like this, the fire could spread through cavities or reach flammable materials if the integrity of the wall is compromised.


Threats also remain in the longer term. In the event of any high temperatures, concrete can conduct heat and retain it over an extended duration, suffi- cient to degrade or damage any enclosed electrical connections. Embedded electrical connections could also be exposed to hidden moisture or damp condi- tions, which could corrode and damage junctions. However, to deal with either of these situations, the


inherent challenge of embedded systems is inspec- tion: the only way to make a visual check is to drill in or completely expose the electrical junction.


FIRE-RESISTANT POLYCARBONATE Using enclosures manufactured from specially treated polycarbonate resistant to flame and heat can protect electrical junctions in the event of a fire. As polycarbonate is non-conductive during fire or heat exposure, the enclosures also prevent the risk of short circuit. Protection features such as ceramic terminal blocks inside the enclosure, resistant to high heat, also help to protect the connections.


Combining these features in a surface-mounted enclosure can ensure electrical integrity for up to 90 minutes, according to the E30-E90 electrical functional integrity standard. This testing and recognition are the hallmark for fire-and heat-pro- tected enclosures like the Spelsberg WKE Lifeline


November 2024 Instrumentation Monthly


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96