search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

#### orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.noItems
Signal conditioning

Figure 1. An op amp, an in-amp, and a comparator.

It is just a triangle, or what does a symbol really mean?

Symbols are important, but what if the symbol can mean several things? In this article, Analog Devices’ Harry Holt, staff applications engineer, and Mike Skroch, applications engineer, explains how choosing the right op amp will result in a trouble-free, production-worthy design for years to come.

mean several things? This can lead to problems, as we shall see. In the

D

analogue world, a triangle can represent an op amp, a comparator, or an instrumentation amplifier. You could force one of them to do the function of one of the others, but system performance would not be optimum. Let us look at their differences and what to be cautious of so we can design around them if possible. As we shall see, there are some cases when you do not even want to try to design with the wrong type of part. Looking at Figure 1, which triangle is the op

amp? Which triangle is the comparator? And which triangle is the instrumentation amplifier? The answer is: They all are! So, what is the difference and why do we care? Looking at Table 1, we can see that there

oes a symbol help or hinder our thinking about a design? Symbols are important, but what if the symbol can

are some big differences in several characteristics, but what do they mean at the circuit and system level? Let us see how you can get into trouble…

FeeDbAck An op amp has a huge gain. We were told in engineering school to start the analysis with the difference between the two inputs equal to zero. But in real life, this cannott be true. If the open- loop gain is one million, then to get 5 V on the output, you would have to have 5 μV on the input. For a usable circuit, we need to apply feedback, so when the output tries to go too high, a control signal is fed back to the input, counteracting the original stimulus—for example, negative feedback. When used as a comparator, with no feedback, the output will slam against one rail or the other; with positive feedback, it will be driven farther in the same

direction. So, op amps need negative feedback. In fact, when some op amps are used as comparators with no feedback, the supply current can be five to 10 times higher than the max on the data sheet.1 For a comparator, however, positive feedback

is exactly what we need. With no feedback, if one input to a comparator slowly crosses the level of the other input, the output will slowly start to change. If there is noise in the system, such as ground bounce, the output may reverse, which is certainly undesirable in a control system. But then it starts changing back, resulting in oscillatory behavior, sometimes called chatter. For an instrumentation amplifier, the feedback

is already internal, so adding feedback just produces an inaccurate gain. A typical way to build an instrumentation amplifier with op amps is shown in Figure 2. Note: there is feedback around each individual

op amp. Let us begin by using the standard negative feedback diagram (see Figure 3) with the in-amp being G, with a desired gain of 10, implying a feedback factor of 0.1. Next, choose an in-amp fixed gain of 100. Using Equation 1, the actual closed-loop gain will be 9.09, almost a 10 per cent error. So, using an in-amp triangle as an op amp and putting feedback around it does not make sense. For an op amp, we really need negative

feedback; for a comparator, we really need positive feedback; and for an in-amp, we do not need any feedback.

Table 1. Comparisons of Op Amps, Comparators, and Instrumentation Amplifiers. 54 March 2021 Instrumentation Monthly

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74