search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Company insight


Chemical reaction: How PCE is catching the eye of manufacturers


Medical device manufacturers have many means of fabrication at their disposal, but they frequently overlook one of the fastest and most efficient. Charles Cohen, president of Fotofab, tells us how photochemical etching could be the answer to many of their problems.


fabrication process and many will talk at length about their relative merits and applications. Ask them about photochemical etching (PCE) and many will have little to say. Those are the ones potentially missing a great opportunity to benefit from a high- precision manufacturing process that could cut costs and get key components into their hands much quicker.


A PCE and PCM


PCE, also known as photochemical machining (PCM), is a non-contact manufacturing process that uses a patterned photosensitive coating, UV light and chemical etchants to remove unwanted metal from a sheet. What is left behind is a thin metal part that can have intricate designs, extremely tight tolerances and can also be formed to 3D shapes. A photoresist is applied to the metal, which is then exposed to UV light using an extremely precise digitally processed light source. The exposed resist is dissolved and an acid removes the unprotected metal areas.


sk medical device manufacturers about 3D printing, stamping or laser cutting in the


Fotofab provides diffusion bonding services to fuse multiple etched metal sheets into 3D structures.


components based in Chicago, Illinois. “It is quick and relatively inexpensive for either small or large parts, and the complexity of the parts makes no difference.


“Stamping puts pressure on the metal sheet and may change its characteristics or may leave a burr – a sharp, rough edge or a small piece of material that protrudes from a metal part,” he continues. “Similarly, laser cutting might


“PCE is quick and relatively inexpensive for either small or large parts, and the complexity of the parts makes no difference.”


“PCE has great advantages,” says Charles Cohen, president of Fotofab, a leading producer of precision photochemical-etched sheet metal


32


change the properties of the metal by heating or leaving rough edges. That does not happen with PCE, which might also produce parts much quicker.”


As an example, Cohen points to a 20x24 sheet in which three million holes have been etched to create a filter. Using a laser-cutting process would require weeks, rather than just a few days with PCE. As well as producing components faster, PCE can also avoid the need for the expensive tooling required by alternative techniques. In some cases, stamping a complex component could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, compared with just a few hundred for etched pieces.


A hidden gem


The technique of chemical etching is not new. As an industry, it goes back to the 1960s, but the process has been used in some form for centuries. Even suits of armour used by knights in medieval times had some decorative designs etched out. It was also used to create letters for


www.medicaldevice-developments.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130