search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Biomaterials


Traditional titanium screws and plates used in implants may need to be removed at a later date, resulting in explant surgery.


for sole support in all larger, high-load-bearing fractures, such as certain types of femoral fractures, where metallic implants often remain the preferred option. With PGA, because it degrades – and therefore, loses its mechanical strength – faster, it’s been used in rods and screws for fractures of cancellous bone, the less dense, spongy inner layer of bone. You can also combine materials to give an implant its desired properties, Oosterbeek explains. He gives an example: PLA can be used alongside hydroxyapatite. “The hydroxyapatite as a ceramic particle will have some mechanical role, it’ll make the material stiffer. But it’s also there as an osteo-conductive material to trigger that behaviour in the physiological environment. So, it has both a mechanical and a biological role.”


Repairing tissue


Resorbable polymers can be used to create scaffolds for tissue regeneration, too. Here, the implant acts as a sort of framework for cells to grow on. These scaffolds “are often porous, because you want some kind of diffusion of oxygen and biological molecules”, says Hatton. “And you want those cells to start forming the tissue and taking over the functions you want.” In dentistry, while the mouth’s sensitivity necessitates careful consideration of inflammation, PLA and PGA are nonetheless utilised in tissue scaffolds and other applications. The risk of inflammation is managed through optimised material design and appropriate clinical application, rather than by broadly avoiding these polymers. Work is under way to develop resorbable membranes, but the path to market is challenging.


98


“The evidence is that it really would work. The problem is that to get a tissue engineering product to market is ten times the cost of just the membrane on its own,” Hatton explains. A limited number of scaffold products are currently available. There are also a handful of bone scaffolds and resorbable stents, which can support the blood vessel as it heals while encouraging regrowth of injured tissue. Because stents need to be quite strong, the material requirements are similar to orthopaedics, says Oosterbeek. Yet polymers like PLA don’t tend to be strong or ductile enough to use in cardiac stents, he adds. So, the struts of the stents tend to be bulkier, “which leads to an increased risk of clotting down the line”. It’s a challenge many are working on: other materials such as polycaprolactone (PCL) are currently being investigated.


While some have used PLA to create scaffolds,


it’s easier to create porous architecture using PCL, Oosterbeek explains: “For a pure scaffold application, it’s generally less about the mechanics and more about the biocompatibility. You would be looking at: do cells grow on this material? While PCL might not be what we call osteo-inductive – it might not induce cells to produce bone – it will be biocompatible. It will allow growth on it, and then people will try to incorporate other elements into a composite to induce that cellular behaviour, by using things like glasses.” It’s something Oosterbeek is currently exploring – creating implants that combine resorbable polymers with bioglass. There are bioglasses that bond very well to bone, and that can help induce growth of both bone and blood vessels, he explains. “All of this is very beneficial for an implant.” ●


www.medicaldevice-developments.com


karegg/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130