Coatings & surface treatment
wings of the insect remain clean, but not through the repelling of bacterial cells, through efficiently killing them on contact.”
It was a finding that would shape the direction of the field. Now, labs and start-ups around the world are hard at work developing surface topographies that can kill and repel bacteria through physical contact. These nanopatterned surfaces offer an alternative to traditional coatings such as silver nanoparticles, which kill bacteria by releasing chemicals. While these coatings are effective, there’s a risk that microbes will develop a resistance to them over time. “Since then, what we see in the field is a huge race to create synthetic analogues of what nature has to offer,” says lecturer in nanomanufacturing at University College London Martyna Michalska.
Killing on contact We’re still learning about how these surfaces kill bacteria, Michalska explains. But we know that the mechanical force on the bacteria when they interact with the surface is key. There are different ways that bacteria can become damaged and die. For one, cells can be stretched between nanopillars, Ivanova explains. “It’s like a balloon. If you start pinching a balloon, it won’t break on the tip of your fingers, it will break in between your fingers.” These can be long and slim, she adds, causing the membrane to bend and stretch. “The membrane elasticity will reach its limit, and it will also break.” Cells can also be cut or pierced on features that are very sharp, such as sharp tips or thin nanosheets that are like blades. “As long as it’s a protruding surface,” says professor of biomedical materials at the University of Bristol Bo Su, “that’s what causes the impedance of bacteria”. Su and his colleagues identified another killing mechanism at play here: oxidative stress. When the bacteria hit the patterned surface and deform, they generate reactive molecules called ROS that damage cells, Su explains. “They’re actually killing themselves.” Researchers are currently exploring which different patterns and features could kill bacteria more effectively, and in different ways. Yet there are important parameters we’re aware of, such as the height, diameter and spacing of nanopillars, says Ivanova. “Those three parameters are critical for achieving the maximum effect.” There are also groups, including Michalska’s, investigating whether bacteria can impale themselves or whether there are other forces, such as capillary action, that are causing this. Because bacteria come in different shapes and sizes, the efficacy of different surfaces would depend on which species are present. For instance, you could expect cicada wing-like patterned surfaces to be effective around Gram-negative bacteria, Ivanova explains. As well as having a thinner cell wall than their
www.medicaldevice-developments.com
Gram-positive counterparts, “Gram-negative bacteria are easier to kill because they have more surface area to interact with the pillars”.
Ivanova, Michalska and Su all agree that chemical coatings, such as silver, are likely to outperform a patterned surface in general. Yet while the efficacy of nanopatterns may vary, Su reports that these surfaces can still perform quite well. “Our killing [rate], normally, is from 90% to 60% or 50%, depending on the time scale.”
A clean surface
Nanopatterned surfaces can also work to prevent bacteria from adhering in the first place, a property known as antifouling. The patterns that we see in nature, such as on insect wings but also plant leaves and eyes, have the ability to control surface interactions with light, liquid and cells – including bacteria, Michalska explains. The joint effect of the pattern and surface chemistry “engineer the wetting properties of the surface”, she says.
Here, surface chemistry could be due to the inherent properties of the material being used or something that’s added to functionalise the surface. While the surface pattern – by trapping tiny pockets of air that block liquid from penetrating through – can physically make it difficult for microbes to stick onto it. Though there could be a situation where the chemistry of the material changes due to shifts in the environment around the implant, Michalska notes, which might then interfere with its antifouling properties. How these surfaces may behave in the body over time is still something the field needs to investigate, she says. “It should be earlier, rather than later that we start looking into these long-term effects. Because we just don’t know.”
In addition, Su has observed that when the bacteria are physically deformed on the nanopattern, such as being impaled or pinned down, there’s no biofilm formation – when microbes attach to a surface and stick together, forming a community and introducing risk of infection. “If you want to prevent the infection, you want to prevent biofilm formation,” he says. “When you have [bacterial cells] pinned down, it’s not easy for them to divide or differentiate. So that actually delays or reduces the biofilm formation.”
Enhanced effects Yet this nanopattern approach is not without shortcomings. For one, due to limitations in nanofabrication techniques, it can be difficult to create a pattern to the precise specifications you want. Plus, one pattern is never going to work for all bacterial species, says Michalska. “That’s why people are looking at augmenting that mechanical bactericidal activity.” One way to do that is by functionalising the surface –
103
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130
