search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Regulatory Monitoring F


or many years, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has used what is now known as real-world data (RWD) and real-


world evidence (RWE). It does so to monitor and evaluate the post-market safety of approved drugs. Throughout history, RWE has also been used to support effectiveness, albeit on a smaller scale. The FDA defines RWD as “data relating to patient health status and/or the delivery of healthcare routinely collected from a variety of sources”. Examples might be data derived from electronic health records, medical claims data, product or disease registries, or other sources, such as digital health technologies. The aim of each is to inform on health status.


made modern


Regulators are shifting from reactive oversight to proactive, data-driven surveillance that draws on IoMT device data, electronic health records and patient registries to enable continuous


benefi t–risk monitoring. This evolving model, aligned with EU MDR Article 83 and refl ected in the US FDA’s Real-World Evidence framework, is explored by Ellie Philpotts with perspectives from product developers, legal experts, academics, consultants and industry leaders.


RWE, meanwhile, refers to the “clinical evidence about the usage and potential benefits or risks of a medical product derived from analysis of RWD”. The FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health has also provided more information on its RWE programme for medical devices specifically. Updated in 2017, this guidance notes that there is “rapidly advancing methodology for generating and interpreting RWD”, and as such it doesn’t “elaborate on the methodological approaches that can be used”. However, it adds, “when reviewing the use of


RWE to support a regulatory decision, the FDA will rely on scientifically robust methods and approaches to determine whether submitted RWE


20


www.medicaldevice-developments.com


metamorworks/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130