Packaging, supply & logistics
full pack traceability – crucial for tracking sterile barrier integrity across cleanrooms, warehouses and shipping lanes. Real-time visibility helps prevent cold-chain breaches and supports the stringent documentation required by the US FDA’s Unique Device Identification system and the EU Medical Device Regulation. As machinery and networks become more entwined, cybersecurity has also risen to the level of an operational necessity. Packaging lines once isolated on proprietary OT networks now connect to enterprise IT for remote monitoring and analytics. Without proper segmentation, hardened end points and continuous threat detection, bad actors could infiltrate production systems, tamper with sterilisation profiles or intercept patient data embedded in packaging records. Sustainability, too, is now ingrained in packaging automation strategies. Automated feeders and precision cutting systems minimise material waste at the source, while inline sorters separate mono-material films for recycling. Vision-guided scanners verify resin types in real time, ensuring that only approved polymers proceed to thermoforming. In medical applications, transparent mono-APET films have emerged as a leading choice, marrying the clarity and barrier performance required for sterile trays with recyclability in existing PET streams. Finally, robotics continue to expand their role beyond simple pick-and-place tasks. Vision-guided robots and collaborative robots (cobots) handle sensitive components with sub-millimetre accuracy, adjust grip force dynamically, and even adapt to slight part variations on the fly. In cleanrooms, where human entry increases contamination risk, cobots can replenish supplies, carry kitted trays and perform automated clean-in-place cycles, reducing downtime and exposure. Together, these trends are knitting individual machines into data-driven ecosystems. Packaging lines are no longer static islands of equipment but living systems that learn, self-optimise and deliver the speed and consistency required in medical device manufacturing.
The early bird
According to Jan Gates, a US-based consultant packaging engineer who advises both start-ups and mid-sized device companies, the biggest missed opportunity lies in timing. “Start-ups often come to automation too late, because they’re understandably focused on developing their product,” she explains. “Packaging becomes something that happens at the end, rather than being integrated early, and that creates avoidable problems later.”
When packaging planning is deferred until after product design, companies face a cascade of issues – compliance failures, costly rework and fractured production workflows. Gates recalls one project in
www.medicaldevice-developments.com
which a mid-sized medical device firm had more than 60 packaging variations across its SKUs. By rationalising those down to four standard formats, her team achieved changeover times under ten minutes (versus more than an hour previously), slashed material waste by 30% and cut inventory carrying costs by a quarter. These gains reflect a broader principle: cross-functional alignment from day one. R&D, quality, regulatory and operations teams must agree on tray dimensions, blister depths and label formats before tooling dollars are spent. Early standardisation simplifies validation protocols, reduces the burden of design controls, and lays the groundwork for scalable automation that grows in step with the product portfolio.
The sustainability factor
Sustainability in medical device packaging extends well beyond waste reduction; it hinges on material selection, recyclability and life-cycle impact. Automation technologies play a central role at every step. Robotic dosing systems deliver resin and adhesive formulations with medical-grade accuracy, minimising off-spec batches. Inline vision inspection scans roll-fed films for gauge variation, inclusions or weld-line irregularities, so only compliant substrate enters the thermoforming process. At end-of-life, automated sorting in recycling plants uses near-infrared sensors to separate mono- APET from mixed polymers, closing the loop on circular packaging systems.
High-clarity mono-APET films have quickly become the material of choice for trays and blisters. These halogen-free, single-polymer films meet USP and ISO biocompatibility standards, offer exceptional transparency for visual inspection, and slip seamlessly into existing PET recycling streams – avoiding the expensive delamination processes required by multi- layer laminates. Independent certifications from bodies such as the Association of Plastic Recyclers reinforce trust with hospital procurement teams, which now demand verifiable sustainability credentials alongside regulatory compliance. Looking ahead, automation will accelerate the adoption of next-generation substrates – biodegradable biopolymers, antimicrobial-embedded films and smart materials that change colour to indicate tampering or temperature excursions. Rigorous thermal, mechanical and sealing tests performed at production speeds will ensure these novel materials meet the uncompromising standards of medical packaging.
Robots in the open Automation on packaging lines isn’t new, but the level of precision now achievable with vision-guided robotics marks an inflection point. Advanced robots equipped with AI-driven cameras can adjust their end-effector force and trajectory in real time, handling soft pouches one moment and rigid vials the next without manual
113
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130
