search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Company insight


Injection molding of thin wall cannulas


Paul Runyan, vice-president of sales, Accumold, on how the leading micro molding innovator has developed a way to produce micro injection mold thin wall cannulas in very high volumes.


H


igh-volume production of small and thin-walled cannulas using traditional methods like extrusion, tipping and gluing to a metal hub presents several limitations that hinder efficiency and quality. Extrusion becomes challenging for extremely small dimensions due to the risk of material inconsistency, wall thickness irregularities and potential defects. Tipping, the process of adding a plastic or metal tip to the cannula, introduces variability in terms of bonding strength and tip alignment, impacting the precision required for medical procedures. Moreover, the gluing process poses reliability concerns as adhesives might degrade over time, leading to potential detachment of the cannula from the hub and compromising patient safety. Furthermore, these traditional methods are labour-intensive and time-consuming, making it difficult to meet the demands of high-volume production efficiently. In contrast, modern manufacturing technologies like micro injection molding offer a more streamlined approach. Micro injection molding enables the creation of intricate and consistent cannula designs with precise wall thickness control. It eliminates the need for separate extrusion, tipping and gluing steps by producing the entire cannula in a single mold, enhancing product reliability and reducing the risk of defects. This approach not only improves the quality and reliability of the cannulas but also offers a more scalable and cost-effective solution for meeting the demands of high- volume production in the medical industry. Material choice is paramount when optimising outcomes in micro molding cannulas due to its profound influence on product performance, reliability and manufacturability. The unique challenges


48


Accumold can produce micro injection mold cannulas with an outside diameter of 0.035in (0.889mm) as routine.


posed by micro-scale manufacturing, such as precise cavity filling and intricate geometry replication, demand materials with specific properties like low viscosity, excellent flowability and minimal shrinkage. Material selection also impacts the durability and biocompatibility of medical devices, ensuring they can withstand the rigors of use while being safe for patient interaction.


Aspects to consider Several critical design for


manufacturability (DFM) considerations must also be addressed. Ensuring uniform wall thickness is paramount, as variations can lead to warping, cooling inconsistencies and inadequate filling. Proper gate placement is essential, influencing material flow and minimising stress points, while suitable venting channels are crucial to prevent air traps that can result in surface defects. Incorporating appropriate draft angles facilitates seamless ejection from the mold and prevents potential damage. Furthermore, maintaining accurate parting line alignment prevents flash and surface mismatches. Strategic placement of features like ribs and supports enhance structural integrity


without compromising the overall design, while carefully considering the positioning of ejector pins prevents interference with critical features during demolding. Additionally, addressing assembly considerations in some instances can be vital, particularly if the cannula is part of a larger device. Ensuring mating surfaces, alignment features, and interlocking mechanisms are well-designed enables smooth integration. Maintaining a balanced aspect ratio is essential to avoid challenges associated with flow dynamics, cooling, and structural integrity. An excessively high aspect ratio can lead to difficulties in material flow and cavity filling, potentially resulting in uneven thickness and defects. Conversely, an aspect ratio that is too low might hinder proper cooling and cause warping, making it vital to strike the right balance that promotes both accurate molding and structural stability.


One other variable that has been critical is the use of proprietary micro molding presses, developed over generations at Accumold. Cannulas were molded on conventional presses and on Accumold’s presses, and it was discovered that conventional micro molding presses had problems with non-fill and flash. Through the use of its fully automated in-house developed micro molding presses and multi-cavity micro mold tooling, Accumold achieved reliable, repeatable and high volume production of up to 40 million parts a year from a single production cell. Micro molding cannulas at volume with an outside diameter of 0.035in (0.889mm), an inside diameter is 0.027in (0.6858mm), and a wall thickness of 0.004in (0.1016mm) is routine at Accumold. ●


www.accu-mold.com Medical Device Developments / www.nsmedicaldevices.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146