search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Biomaterials


not be gold (or silicone or graphene or any other novel tech material).


Innovators may be good generating hype around a shiny new gadget, but all too often medical devices get rolled out before anyone can say just what their application might be. By the same token, not all pioneering medical devices need to be complicated, state-of-the-art contraptions. In many cases, the principle of Occam’s razor holds true; simplicity and efficacy go hand in hand. One recent invention, the STEM-device developed by rheumatology experts Thomas G. Baboolal, Elena Jones and Dennis McGonagle at the Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine is a case in point. “We called it a synovial brush, or a toothbrush for the knee,” McGonagle says. This no-frills bit of kit is a prime example of purpose- built equipment, specifically designed to turn sound scientific theory into groundbreaking therapeutic reality. The handheld STEM-device might look like a toothbrush, but it’s what it does that matters. Baboolal, Jones and McGonagle’s STEM-device is the product of almost two decades of research into native osteoarthritic abnormal joint environment and the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that reside in synovial fluid. “We first discovered synovial fluid resident stem cells in 2004,” McGonagle explains. “And then in 2008, we found that these cells were 100 times more numerous in the fluid in early osteoarthritis.” Appearing in joint cavities, synovial fluid primarily works to lubricate and nourish articular cartilage. But when Jones and McGonagle discovered increased numbers of MSCs in the osteoarthritic abnormal joint environment, they began asking serious questions about where these cells originate and what they might do. In 2016, with Baboolal and others, they published their early findings in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. Using a dog model of joint distraction – a technique whereby metal pins are placed across the knee joint to encourage space between the bones – McGonagle et al. demonstrated that “when we took out these stem cells, tagged them, re-injected them into the joint and pulled the joint apart, there was increased adhesion of these stem cells to the injured superficial cartilage,” he explains. “When you correct the mechanical environment,” so their theory goes, “the earliest pathology in osteoarthritis starts in the superficial cartilage and in the knee”.


Conservation, preservation and restoration


According to McGonagle, to date there are no proven medical therapies for osteoarthritis. The only established treatment is joint replacement, which, though tried and tested in a limited number


Medical Device Developments / www.nsmedicaldevices.com


of joints, is far from ideal. “For me, it’s like this,” McGonagle continues, “100 years ago you had dentists and they pulled teeth, and you had orthopaedic surgeons and they replaced joints. Now in dentistry, the last thing you want to do is pull a tooth: it’s all about conservation, preservation and restoration. The same is true in orthopaedic surgery. We know so much now about the reparative environment of osteoarthritis, that we could be getting all these [patients] in their 40s and 50s and creating an environment to regenerate the joints and keep them going without getting to this end-stage disease.” It’s this vision that put McGonagle, Jones and Baboolal on a track to create the STEM-device. The team at Leeds are not the first to harness MSCs for osteoarthritis, but the brilliance of their approach lies in its sheer simplicity, economy and efficacy. “To repair cartilage”, McGonagle explains, “surgeons have used a number of methods with limited success, including bone microfracture, cartilage biopsy with digestion, and culture expansion with cell reintroduction in a scaffold”. In the latter procedure, stem cells derived from bone marrow and other sources are “expanded in an expensive facility for up to a month, and then injected back into the defect via a carrier,” says McGonagle. Using the STEM-device, however, this process might be radically simplified. In a recent


“One-hundred years ago you had dentists and they pulled teeth, and you had orthopaedic surgeons and they replaced joints. Now in dentistry, the last thing you want to do is pull a tooth: it’s all about conservation, preservation and restoration. The same is true in orthopaedic surgery.”


paper published by Dr Ala Altaie, a stem cell biologist working alongside the Leeds orthopaedic team, findings revealed that the synovial brush could release enough stem cells to make cartilage in the lab, without the need for culture expansion. The STEM-device is designed to be used in conjunction with nascent regenerative orthopaedic procedures, such as joint distractions and wedge osteotomies. “We’re trying to set the scene so that surgeons appreciate that joints can repair themselves when you correct the environment,” McGonagle says. “When the surgeons are in the joint repairing it, they’re doing it under arthroscopy and irrigation, so the joint is expanded, and they are actually washing out stem cells and growth


111


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146