search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
096 OLYMPICS


as a ‘design flaw anticipating eat-out hipsterdom’. So it goes. Explanations of how and why things happened are a little tricky. Te park has been given a distracting glitter, by the UCL, LFF and V&A, so much tinsel shaken out across the site amidst some of the towers the colour of scorched earth. Such nuggets fall like meteors from another planet to pique our curiosity more than they satisfy it, about how it might be done better. You pass by the apartments, products of the new city, and aggressive minimalism of some of the blocks, beautifully bleak, dialogues of non- connection. London’s melting pot holds many lumps, like the hungry looking for a feast to which they had no hope of being invited, watching as those towers were erected. It had been going pristine for a while, but now this part of the East End has been sanitised and skyscraperised. Much of the architecture shows a certain reticence, the Zen term mu seems applicable: it means nothingness as a spiritual and aesthetic


concept, and in architecture approximates to Mies van der Rohe’s desired minimalism, beinahe nichts – almost nothing. So now we have a lot of new buildings, nothing obtrusive, nothing cheap, unenchanting architecture that disappears, diluted of meaning and a sense of place. Te net effect is perilously close to stultification. It is enough to make one echo Ian Nairn fulminating in 1966: ‘Stop all the architects now… the outstanding and appalling fact about modern architecture is that it is not good enough.’ Te parade’s passed by, the Olympic circus has struck its tents, the whole thing dissolved, and we are left with an architectural nothing. Yet ugly buildings have always been with us, and there is only so much architects can do about it. Te farraginous method of development made this almost inevitable.


Now in France, 12 years later, there were no new sporting facilities. Everything required for an Olympic Games was already there. It was all simply upgraded, extended,


refurbished, repurposed, and generally done over. It was the first time there has been so little building for the Games. Te ‘emblematic’ project of the Games was not a building at all, but the ‘reconquest’ of the Seine as part of a €1.4bn national, regional and city project, the plan baignade, to cleanse the river from its source to the sea. Te pursuit of civilised urban life extended to over 20 projects completed under the heading of Réinventer Paris. Monuments abound in the city itself, so the desire was to make it all more enjoyable and healthy for everyone that lives there and visits. Important public spaces such as the Place de la République and the Place de la Bastille were made progressively more pedestrian-friendly. An urban forest of 478 trees were planted near the Gare Montparnasse in the Place de Catalogne. Te Champs-Élysées became a pedestrian- friendly ‘extraordinary garden’. Other items in this pro-pedestrian, pro-bike, pro-tree, anti- car banquet included 1,000km of cycle lanes


This image and right The Olympic Village’s 2,800 units will become permanent homes for up to 6,000 people


Above and far right The Grand Palais was renovated and hosted fencing and taekwondo


RIGHT: PARIS 2024 RAPHAEL VRIET


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149