search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
| 37


prices than in standard, undried. And by November latest investment in value-added production will have doubled our multi-ply, finger-jointed window and door scantlings capacity. We’re also increasing kilning capacity.”


The company is clearly confident of a bright future in these engineered components, with customers increasingly won over by their technical benefits.


“Demand for scantlings is increasing and end users who switch to them are very happy with the results,” said Mr Janssen. “They’re stable, predictable and enable manufacturers to calculate their yield and costs in a way that’s just not possible with rough lumber. They can also have longer lengths on a consistent basis – we supply everything in 5.9m.”


These products also provide a route for Interholco to introduce more lesser-known tropical timber, use of which reduces supply stress on traditionally more popular species. Some also see it as making sustainable forest management more economically viable, in that it increases timber yield from a given forest area.


“Customers who buy our scantlings are more concerned with technical performance and yield – and some are achieving 95%. They’re less concerned with species,” said Mr Janssen. “Timber we’re using includes kosipo, sapelli, sipo, bosse, limbali and kanda and we’re doing further tests with tali and wenge.” Further underpinning development of the scantlings business, Interholco has received gluing quality certification in France under the FCBA CTB scheme, and the SKH KOMO scheme for the Netherlands, regarded as one of the most demanding of its kind. “These give customers added confidence in quality and also enable them to get better product insurance,” said Mr Janssen. One market proving more resistant to the value-added trend in tropical timber seems to be the UK. “Overall it seems more conservative and species focused. Potential customers also comment on the higher initial price,” said Mr Janssen. “However, we have been getting enquiries and, while it may take time, we’re confident demand will grow. It has to be the way forward if joinery end users want to control costs and compete in terms of technical performance predictability with materials like PVC and aluminium.” Next year will see the pace of development at Interholco step up another gear. It says its investment at IFO’s Ouesso site will be a “significant sum”.


“It will be a major modernisation programme, replacing older equipment with the latest technology,” said Mr Janssen. “We’re developing a new line to increase production of boules and bigger dimension beams and other products. We will also develop sawn timber capacity to supply the


increasing requirements of our value-added production.”


The scale of the upgrade means it will reduce output next year.


“But customers will see the benefits coming through in 2025 and it will set the foundations for increased industrial, value- added production going forward,” said Mr Janssen.


Interholco is a long-term adherent of FSC certification – 100% of timber from its own concessions is FSC certified and 88% of that from outside sources – and in March it gained FSC Eco-systems certification for biodiversity protection. This year it has also been undergoing accreditation to the PEFC- endorsed Pan African Forest Certification scheme.


“Continuous improvement of our environmental performance is part of our DNA and securing PAFC certification is a reflection of this,” said Mr Janssen. “FSC and PEFC/PAFC schemes have the same basic rules, but they’re also complementary. PEFC follows ISO standards for forestry, a much- needed addition to the socio-environmental safeguards of FSC.”


Interholco, he added, had just had its final PEFC audit and was expecting certification to follow imminently. Since 2017, the company has also been engaged with the Zoological Society of London’s (ZSL) international SPOTT analysis programme. Each year this assesses 100 tropical forestry, palm oil and natural rubber companies on public disclosure of ‘policies, and practices related to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues’.


“SPOTT scores companies against sector- specific ESG indicators to benchmark progress and, by tracking transparency, incentivises implementation of corporate best practice,” says ZSL. “Investors, buyers and other key influencers can use SPOTT assessments to inform stakeholder engagement, manage ESG risk, and increase transparency across multiple industries.”


This August, for the seventh year in


a row, Interholco was ranked first of the 100 companies involved, scoring 95.2% in assessment against 150 indicators. “SPOTT does not solely rely on commitments or policies, but also looks at progress and implementation on the ground,” says Interholco. “The SPOTT team also comprises actual people with proven expertise and analytical finesse. It is not an AI-compiled scorecard.”


The company has become more attuned to the SPOTT process with time, but initially found it “pretty demanding”. “We regularly take the pulse of what is close to the heart of external as well as internal stakeholders. We engage with employees, trade unions, our peers and listen to what is expected of the company


Above: Interholco believes that value-added tropical timber has to be the way forward if joinery end users want to control costs and compete in terms of technical performance predictability with materials like PVC and aluminium


www.ttjonline.com | November/December 2023 | TTJ


by everyone from indigenous peoples to B2B customers. So we had a number of policies and online documents, reports and procedures we had to go through. SPOTT may not have really changed the way we work, but it’s made us more aware of where and how transparency is expected.


“Obviously we’re happy to come first again,” said Mr Janssen. “But we value the SPOTT process overall. It makes you ask ‘can we do better?’. It also challenges competitors to improve, so it’s good for the wider industry.”


In terms of environmental compliance the next challenge for the European industry and its suppliers will be the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), which comes into force from 2025. Interholco is sure it can rise to it. “We’re confident we can meet all requirements, including for geolocation details for timber origin, having the advantage that most of our timber comes from our own concession,” said Mr Janssen. “Some of the details of implementation are still unknown, such as how the European portal for downloading EUDR information will operate, whether we can give plot information annually, or have to provide it on each invoice. But we don’t foresee problems.” Interholco is also optimistic about prospects for the business as a whole.


“Short term it may be more challenging given the state of the market and the development work we’re undertaking,” said Mr Janssen. “But we’re confident wood demand will continue increasing and that, with the investment we’re putting in place and our commitments to sustainability, we will be well placed to benefit.” ■


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85