| 41
• The reliability of equipment working under challenging conditions
• Keeping track of the location and amount of stock in the forest
• Forest roads are often unsealed, single- track and slow to traverse, making transit
times unreliable
In essence, wood, being a natural product, is variable, and production and transport occur in physically difficult conditions over a wide geographical area.
The planning and scheduling task is a multi-faceted optimisation challenge that includes the following sub-problems:
• Sequencing at load and unload points without exceeding the capacity of the
loading and unloading equipment.
• Allocating and sequencing loads onto vehicles, subject to compatibility
constraints, delivery windows and driver fatigue management constraints.
• Determining product flows in cases where one product may go from the same source
to multiple destinations or from various sources to the same destination.
Each of these is a complex optimisation problem and, combined, they form a unique challenge requiring an integrated optimisation solution.
OPTIMISATION IN THE TIMBER TRADE: ARAUCO CHILE
The ARAUCO project essentially upgrades a first-generation optimisation application. ARAUCO is a global manufacturer of forest products, serving customers with excellence in the manufacturing and distribution of wood products. With roots in sustainable forestry and innovative product development, ARAUCO brings more than a half-century of manufacturing and supply chain excellence to the market.
The project has benefitted immensely from ARAUCO’s experience and the infrastructure put in place to support the previous application. However, the new challenge was to provide a much richer solution, with more detailed scheduling and consideration of many more critical constraints, such as driver breaks, loading times and queuing. Another aspect of the project was to improve scalability so that ARAUCO could optimise its entire operation in one go, rather than splitting it up into parts. Solving the combined problem opened up new opportunities for better co-ordination and efficiencies. The key objectives are:
• Utilise the available drivers, equipment and vehicles as efficiently as possible
• Create detailed schedules that avoid queueing and consider driver breaks
• Create practical schedules that have a high degree of adherence
Tactical planning and scheduling is now in daily operation, and the priority is to embed the system into business as usual, incrementally improving the solution and consolidating the expected productivity benefits. Further applications in the project plan include real-time dynamic optimisation and long-term planning.
THE TIME HORIZONS FROM LONG-TERM PLANNING TO MINUTE-TO-MINUTE OPTIMISATION
Supply chain optimisation typically operates over different time horizons:
• Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) or Sales and Operating Plan (S&OP) driven by sales
forecasts
• Tactical planning over periods from weeks to months
• Detailed scheduling, day ahead to week ahead
• Rescheduling
Over time, the problem changes. Long- term planning is more about estimating the resources, in terms of material, people and assets, that would be required to meet the sales forecast. If the forecast exceeds the available resources, we have a supply problem and need to find additional resources. Otherwise, we will have a problem with demand and will look for more customers. Tactical planning is more about allocating the available resources. Scheduling is a much more difficult challenge. Detailed schedules are required to co-ordinate upstream and downstream resources and avoid conflicts and congestion. Rescheduling requires detailed status information as a starting point to go forward. It has complex logic to express what can be changed (for example, a future pickup) and what must be left alone (a delivery from a loaded truck en route).
INTEGRATION OF OPTIMISATION We were fortunate that ARAUCO had optimisation experience and mature business processes to support it. Customers new to optimisation need to think about change management. Moving to more automated planning and scheduling requires accurate, complete data to work correctly. Humans are very good at filling in gaps, interpreting data and memorising rules and constraints. For success, it is essential to:
• Agree on the interpretation of the rules, regulations and other constraints.
• Build and maintain a fleet and driver information database and other sources of
truth that change infrequently.
• Ensure that customer orders have sufficient, accurate data
• Provide the ability to track the current situation, such as order status and
inventory
It is also essential that users can build their solution and compare it with the optimiser so that they develop faith in the solution.
THE BUSINESS BENEFITS Productivity, efficiency, or cost reduction has typically motivated optimisation. Increasing asset utilisation, trucks, drivers and cranes, and reducing empty running and waiting times result from better scheduling and co-ordination. Practical schedules that reflect reality and can be adhered to are also essential. However, the benefits of customer service and safety are equally important. Service levels and safety rules can be coded as hard constraints, never to be violated. If there is discretion, we can use soft limitations and warnings. Either way, customer service and safety are kept front and centre in the scheduling task and never forgotten. Actual examples of benefits for more complex, dynamic operations include:
• 10% increase in productivity for the retail supply chain
• 20% reduction in customer complaints for courier delivery
• 10% increase in productivity for advanced manufacturing
We don’t expect forest products to be that different.
FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
Re-optimisation, whereby the frequency is more often than once a day, is just the start. Our experience of dispatch, where the optimiser runs every minute or so, suggests that additional benefits are possible by using additional data streams. This development has the potential for automated operation without a planner or allocator. The system directs the operation.
Data fusion will enable more accurate schedules with up-to-date information on stock levels, harvesting rates, vehicle location and queues.
The last piece of the jigsaw is machine learning, where equipment and human performance in the field, such as loading and unloading and queueing behaviour, can be analysed, modelled and predicted to enhance schedule adherence even further.
CONCLUSIONS
Forest product supply chains have unique characteristics but many things in common with those in retail and advanced manufacturing – complexity and variability present challenges and opportunities for improvements in productivity, customer service and compliance. New optimisation technology based on AI is proving to be up to this challenge and delivers accurate, detailed schedules with high adherence. The ARAUCO project is a case in point. ■
www.ttjonline.com | July/August 2024 | TTJ
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77